|

|
 |
Silver, B., & Hodgson, C.S. (1997). Evaluating GPAs and MCAT scores
as Predictors of NBME I and Clerkship Performances Based on Students'
Data from one Undergraduate Institution. Academic Medicine,
72, 394-396.
PURPOSE: To examine the relationships among undergraduate
student characteristics, standardized indicators of medical school
academic performance, and clinical performances in an institution
where the undergraduate grading system was not a confounding factor.
METHOD: In 1993 data were collected retrospectively for
the classes of 1990-1993 in the University of California, Riverside
(UCR)/University of California, Los Angeles, Biomedical Sciences
Program, in which all the students completed their undergraduate
studies at UCR. Data were collected on the students' demographic
characteristics, undergraduate grade-point averages (UGPAs), Medical
College Admission Test (MCAT) scores, National Board of Medical
Examiners Part I (NBME I) scores, and clinical performances as measured
by core clerkship grades. Regression analyses were used to evaluate
(1) the relationship between clinical performances and data available
at admission and (2) the relationship between NBME I scores and
the same variables. The top and bottom 25% of each class were identified
by UGPAs and compared by their NBME I scores and clinical performances
to determine whether differences noted at admission continued to
separate the students. Differences were tested using independent
two-tailed t-tests.
RESULTS: Of the 92 students, data were available for 88
(96%); 39% were female and 38% were foreign-born. The sample was
fairly heterogeneous in terms of UGPAs, MCAT scores, clinical performance
grades, and NBME I scores. Results of the first regression analysis
indicated that mean clinical performance was not related to any
of the undergraduate predictors of performance or to the students'
demographics. The second regression analysis indicated that MCAT
scores and cumulative science UGPAs were related to performance
on the NBME I, as were country of origin and sex. The students in
the top and bottom 25% differed significantly in their scores on
the NBME I, but not in their clinical performances.
CONCLUSION: Although UGPAs and MCAT scores are good indicators
of NBME I performance, they are still not useful in predicting clinical
performance, even when the students' data are taken from the same
undergraduate institution.
|