AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

November 2008 Home

Reporter Archive

Reporter Home

AAMC Newsroom


Managing Editor
Scott Harris
sharris@aamc.org

Staff Writer
Elissa Fuchs
efuchs@aamc.org

AAMC Reporter: November 2008

Medical Schools, Teaching Hospitals Focus on the Future at AAMC Annual Meeting

#

Related Resource

2008 Annual Meeting Highlights

ted koppel
Ted Koppel

As voters were charting a course for America's future, medical school and teaching hospital leaders convened to examine the future of medical education and health care at the 2008 AAMC Annual Meeting.

Those who attended the meeting, which had a theme of "Creating a Better Tomorrow," were encouraged to explore the widespread challenges and opportunities facing academic medicine's key mission areas of education, patient care, and research, as well as the ways in which medical schools and teaching hospitals might take the initiative to change even as a new presidential administration and Congress begin to evaluate potential reforms to the nation's health care system.

"I hope we stand ready to face some of the toughest questions for academic medicine and move closer to individual and collective answers and action," said AAMC President and CEO Darrell G. Kirch, M.D., in his President's Address at the meeting.

"The reality is that we have been living with far too much injustice in our current health system. As a profession, we have been waiting for someone else to fix the system, just as we, as a nation, have been waiting for a new leader to fix our country. Are we prepared to make some individual and institutional sacrifices without waiting for someone to change the system for us?" Kirch said.

In his keynote address, veteran broadcast journalist Ted Koppel echoed that sentiment, on a larger scale, when he said "I cannot remember a more dangerous time than the one we find ourselves in today," and said that personal responsibility was key to confronting urgent national problems including mountainous debt, geopolitical instability, and an unsustainable energy supply.

"We all have to be prepared to give up something," Koppel said. "Ours is the era of perceived entitlement."

Koppel, who spoke three days before the election, predicted Barack Obama would win, and said he was "excited that finally a black man is going to be elected to the highest office in the land." He added that he believed Obama could be a good president, but "was not Superman," and would need the public's help in effecting change.

During his speech, Kirch urged the medical school and teaching hospital communities to respond to what he said were "the tough questions" that faced them, including preventing conflicts of interest; addressing the disparity of resources among medical schools and teaching hospitals and the economic inequality among medical specialties; finding true balance in academic medicine's mission areas of education, research, and patient care; achieving flexibility and responsiveness in preparing a new generation of doctors; and leading improvements to health care quality and safety.

"Do we need to free ourselves much more aggressively from perceived conflicts of interest with industry, and will that be enough to preserve the public trust in medicine?" Kirch asked in his address. "This question is fundamental to our institutions and our daily work."

Several academic medical institutions and professional groups discussed ways of avoiding conflicts of interest in medical education and research, while leaving beneficial business relationships intact.

"Industry wouldn't be spending tens of billions of dollars on promotion if it didn't work," said Arthur S. Levine, M.D., who as University of Pittsburgh senior vice chancellor for health sciences and dean of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine has helped create one of the nation's most comprehensive conflictof- interest policies for the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. "[Academic medicine has] not built an effective firewall between academia and industry...There's a good way to do it, and a bad way to do it."

With the presidential election on everyone's mind, many conversations turned to the nation's health care system. Karen Davis, Ph.D., president of The Commonwealth Fund, a health care research foundation, provided a framework for how she believed the system could reduce costs while improving health outcomes. Davis, who delivered the meeting's John A.D. Cooper Lecture, said that health IT, financial changes such as episode-of-care payments, and more initiatives to raise the quality of care (as well as studies on the effectiveness of those initiatives) could lead to improvements. She named academic medical centers she said were making progress in these and other areas, and echoed the message of Kirch and Koppel by encouraging medical schools and teaching hospitals to "play a leading role" in health care reform.

"There's no alternative to seizing the day," Davis said. "Academic medicine has the potential to show us the way, and make the United States the new model of health care for other nations."

In the Jordan J. Cohen Lecture, Madeline H. Schmitt, Ph.D., professor emeritus at the University of Rochester School of Nursing, said that interprofessional education—and, by extension, a future generation of physicians that work more in concert with other providers—can improve health care delivery and ease the impact of a widely predicted physician shortage, particularly among primary care specialties.

"Evidence is rapidly emerging that links teamwork to improvements in patient care," Schmitt said, "but this work is only now getting off the ground."

Schmitt recommended that all health professions jointly develop an "ethical framework" for health care delivery, and that medical students learn about other health professions.

In his address to the membership, AAMC Chair Robert J. Desnick, Ph.D., M.D., professor and chair of the Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and physician-in-chief of the Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics at The Mount Sinai Hospital, said that genomic medicine could affect the future landscape of medicine.

"Genome-based medicine will be the medicine of the 21st century," Desnick said. "We need to teach it, we need to be comfortable with it, and our patients will benefit from it."

The 2008 AAMC Annual Meeting took place Oct. 31–Nov. 5 in San Antonio, Texas.

—By Scott Harris


Contact Us    © 1995-2009 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement