AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

February 2009 Home

Reporter Archive

Reporter Home

AAMC Newsroom


Managing Editor
Scott Harris
sharris@aamc.org

Staff Writer
Elissa Fuchs
efuchs@aamc.org

AAMC Reporter: February 2009

Viewpoint: A Blueprint for Better Cancer Care

#

Ellen Stovall, acting president and CEO, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship
Ellen Stovall, acting president and CEO, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship


Related Resources

National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS)

Cancer Quality Alliance (CQA)

Blueprint for a Better Cancer Care System

William Jennings Bryan once said, "Destiny is not a thing to be waited for; it is a thing to be achieved." In the field of cancer, medical researchers, health care providers, and patient advocates are the architects of our destiny. These individuals push science, patient care, and policy toward achievable goals. Their approach toward cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment is thoughtful and deliberate, and it results in a blueprint for a course of life with cancer we call survivorship.

As physicians, educators, and medical students, you know only too well the ravages of cancer. Soon to surpass heart disease as the leading cause of death in this country, one out of two men and one out of three women is currently diagnosed with cancer during their lifetimes. Thankfully, because of improved prevention, detection, and treatments, more people are surviving cancer and we are seeing a shift in some cancers from an acute disease to a manageable chronic disease. A recent American Cancer Society report tells us that while 1.4 million people are diagnosed with cancer each year, fewer men and women are dying. According to the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS), there are now nearly 12 million cancer survivors.

To continue to enhance cancer survivors' quality of life, we must carefully examine and improve the distinct health care needs of this growing population. Physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and financial concerns play key roles in every facet of cancer care. Everyone with a history of cancer, whether their survivorship is measured in days, months, or decades, deserves appropriate care before, during, and after treatment. As "architects" of survivorship, we must continue to drive optimal outcomes with courage, sensitivity, and commitment.

To that end, a multidisciplinary group of stakeholders in the cancer community known as the Cancer Quality Alliance (CQA), co-chaired by NCCS, recently developed and released the "Blueprint for a Better Cancer Care System." This document attempts to illustrate a collaborative vision of coordinated cancer care using existing and imagined best practices. The blueprint shows on a case-by-case basis some of the gaps in the current health care system and how filling those gaps with quality improvement initiatives and treatment and survivorship planning could transform the system to benefit all cancer survivors.

Five case studies featuring soft tissue sarcoma, breast cancer, rectal cancer, and Hodgkin's disease are examined in the CQA blueprint. As each case description moves through the cancer care trajectory—detection, diagnosis, treatment, post-treatment/survivorship, and end-of-life care—the cases are examined according to standards set forth by the Institute of Medicine: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. Each is presented in a best-case/worst-case scenario narrative that illustrates many of the complexities and challenges of the health care system, such as inadequate clinical information technology, incomplete evidence on best practices, staffing shortfalls, complex reimbursement policies, administrative burdens, and other system barriers to quality care. Then the document explains what went right in each case study when proactive and evidence-based steps were taken by various stakeholders, including health care providers, insurers/payers, policy makers, patients, and families.

Each case study is an amalgamation of events that have been known to take place in a variety of care settings. Common mistakes such as delays in detection and misdiagnoses, missed opportunities to receive expert input, and shortcomings such as lax protocols and a lack of counseling, are juxtaposed against real solutions to those deficiencies. Then a discussion reviews the results of each scenario.

Designed as a teaching tool for a broad audience, the blueprint is written in clear language with tables for each case that outline what went right and what went wrong as well as steps to optimal care. The Cancer Quality Alliance hopes that the blueprint will encourage stakeholders to explore options, mine resources, and think of possibilities for improving the care people with cancer receive.

As part of an academic setting, you are potentially in a key role to lead the way. The multidisciplinary environment you're a part of gives you the opportunity to learn about and implement the methods needed to achieve optimal care. At your fingertips lies access to knowledge and the resources to enable you to become pioneers in a model for developing and delivering integrative, coordinated cancer care that is truly patient-centered.

We in the cancer community want to play a role in our own destiny by keeping pace with science, pressing for the most advantageous outcomes, and changing paradigms when appropriate. Initiatives like the blueprint provide a valuable mechanism to educate and inspire.

 

Editor's Note: The opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the AAMC or its members.


Contact Us    © 1995-2009 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement