![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
FeatureManaging the Functions of Faculty Affairs in Medical SchoolsOver the past 20 years, the management of the affairs of faculty transitions has become a core function of medical school administration. In this period of time the number of full time medical school faculty members has more than doubled from approximately 61,000 in 1986, to current numbers of more than 115,000. Over the same period of time, the relationship of academic departments to research centers and teaching hospitals has become more complex and the variety of academic tracks has expanded to accommodate new faculty roles and broadened forms of scholarship. Increasingly, medical school deans are assigning core responsibility to senior decanal officers who must build honest and open relationships across the health science center and across the hierarchy of senior leadership (including university and hospital CEOs), department chairs, and diverse faculty and staff. Faculty Affairs: An increasingly complex support function in medical schools
Whether they are assigned to a single faculty affairs dean or distributed to a team of individuals, the faculty affairs functions are core to the effective operations and growth of medical schools. Relationship building is key and support of the dean is critical to the success of the staff who guide policy-building to support faculty efforts, monitor practices of recruitment and advancement, and organize professional development programs. The AAMC Faculty Affairs Forum offers a national network for faculty affairs professionals by providing resources, a rich network of peers through listserve communications and professional development conferences. The workshop for new faculty affairs officers held on the first day of the 2005 AAMC Faculty Affairs Professional Development Conference offered a reading list with topics that range from difficult conversations to negotiation skills to contemporary descriptions of scholarship. Workshop discussions reflected the dynamic tensions institutional and individual faculty needs, regulatory policies and professional development programs, autonomy and accountability. The investment in faculty affairs and professional development activities in medical schools can yield significant returns with modest investments. The feature article in the Winter 2006 Faculty Vitae addressed the application of not-for-profit business knowledge to the functions of retention of medical faculty. Leading Faculty Affairs deans feel it is important to model wise use of institutional resources in the operation of the offices of Faculty Affairs. Drs. Otto, Novielli, and Morahan describe the use of models to measure the value of organizational activities such as faculty development in their article, "Implementing the Logic Model for Measuring the Value of Faculty Affairs Activities." Acad Med 2006; 81:280-29-85. Dr. Steve Bogdewic, Executive Dean for Faculty Development at Indiana University College of Medicine and a member of the AAMC Faculty Affairs Planning Committee, tells us "a renewed emphasis on faculty development does not mean the creation of a new massive infrastructure." Faculty development/academic affairs offices make the most of existing resources by:
Since his appointment as Executive Dean for Faculty Development at Indiana University School of Medicine, Dr. Bodgewic has been demonstrating how a modestly staffed office can support the work of professional development by:
Faculty Affairs officers in a variety of medical schools in North America are finding success in offering cost-effective professional development. This is evinced by a growing numbers of medical school based faculty affairs offices and faculty development programs. The Spring 2006 Faculty Vitae offers a catalog of programs housed in medical schools. The Evolution of National Agendas to Advance Medical Faculty Affairs, 1987-2006
Drs. Tom Viggiano and Henry Strobel are two faculty affairs deans who have been engaged in the growing community of faculty affairs officers over the past 20 years. They describe this growth as an evolution of "a collaborative community of learning and practice focused on the enhancement of faculty function and success in their various roles in Academic Health Centers." This evolution began in 1987 with the support of former AAMC staff member, Janet Bickel, and the establishment of a professional interest group. The Faculty Affairs Forum brought institutional officials together to address major issues of resource constraints and tenure policies. Over the course of its first seven years, the focus was largely upon the historical linking of tenure with salary guarantees. Faculty Affairs officers brought to this discussion a call to address the professional development of faculty at the same time as institutions were implementing systems of mission-based management to address allocation of resources. Programs to support the advancement of women and minority faculty arose during this time, and many called for new definitions of scholarship to advance the increasingly diverse service and education roles of medical faculty. By the time the Faculty Affairs Forum held its third professional development conference in Snowmass, CO, in 1997, the Carnegie Foundation had published its report, "Scholarship Assessed." This work challenged the academic community to broaden its definitions of scholarship and reinforced initiatives from within the AAMC Group on Educational Affairs (GEA) and the Faculty Affairs Forum. Representatives of these two groups recently joined together for a national dialogue at the GEA Consensus Conference on Educational Scholarship, the most recent advance in a five year project on the part of GEA leadership to "value faculty who support and advance the core mission of medical education through academic promotion."
This year, the members of the Faculty Affairs forum have requested recognition as one of the formal professional development Groups of the AAMC. The AAMC Executive Council endorsed the forum's moving forward with developing rules and regulations for consideration at the June 2006 Executive Council meeting. The Group will formalize the identity of this important set of functions of supporting faculty affairs in medical schools by addressing policies and academic and leadership professional development of medical faculty through the following activities:
The next Faculty Affairs Professional Development Conference is scheduled for January 27-30, 2007, in San Diego, CA. The conference is open to all faculty, but is specifically designed for individuals with responsibility for program, policies, and procedures in the areas of faculty appointment, promotion and career development. For additional information on Faculty Affairs resources, e-mail Valarie Clark, Director of Faculty Development Programs, at vclark@aamc.org. Information about resources and listserve subscription can also be found on the Faculty Affairs Web site. |
||||
|
Contact Us © 1995-2008 AAMC Terms and Conditions Privacy Statement |