![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Comprehensive Professional Development for Medical Faculty
The increasing complexity of our medical schools and teaching hospital relationships and the logarithmic growth of medical faculty over the past two decades have created an environment in which academic success can no longer be left to chance. As with any productive organization, our medical schools are able to meet challenging economic targets, community responsibilities, and academic contribution only when they foster the skill development of faculty and staff and reward productivity that meets institutional mission. Success relies upon our attention to the professional development, supporting policies, and community in parallel to organizational development and strategic management of resources. This interdependence of institutional and faculty achievement is a necessary relationship to sustain faculty vitality. Faculty Vitality Supports Individuals and Institutions
The practices and scholarship of faculty development originate from diverse initiatives supporting faculty recruitment, advancement, and retention: affirmative action initiatives for women and racial/ ethnic minorities, faculty affairs policy development, educational faculty development programs, and research on productive researchers and teachers. Substantive discussions of faculty have been published over the past five years, discussions that can guide the development or expansion of programs in our medical schools. Whether reporting studies of productivity of research scientists, career satisfaction of clinical educators, or the general environment for mission related activities, the results are the same: effective policies that reward contribution to the missions of research, teaching, and service combined with skill development and academic community support are essential to maintaining productive faculty. This work is summarized in the Resource section of this newsletter. It is supported by the activities of the AAMC's new section on Faculty Development and Leadership programs (FD&L) through professional development programs, analysis of outcomes of policies and practices of medical schools and teaching hospitals, and communications such as this newsletter, Faculty Vitae. In fact, the activities of FD&L are all organized around this concept of Vitality as arising from both Individual and Institutional contribution. We aim to support the essential components of Capability, Responsibility, and Community.
A New Publication For Faculty Development
Faculty Vitae, the web-based publication from the AAMC, features news, short lessons for professional development in management and leadership, and research on issues related to faculty development. Each issue of this electronic publication is organized around a theme that is of central importance to the faculty of medical schools. The publication is distributed to medical faculty and leadership of medical schools to enhance the leadership capabilities of communities of medical faculty through professional development. You can expect each issue to include the following sections that address both individual and institutional aspects of faculty development:
Summaries of selected research reports on faculty development:Bland CF, Seaquist E, Pacala JT, Center B, Finstad D. One school's strategy to assess and improve the vitality of its faculty. Acad Med 2002;77:368-376 The authors summarize literature findings on institutional and faculty vitality, then present results of a school-wide survey of University of Minnesota medical faculty vitality, focusing in particular on research faculty. Key findings from the literature: Research faculty who move from institutions with less conducive policies to support their scholarship become more productive in institutions that have a scholarly environment with support of resources, colleagues, policies. Effective faculty development must address individual and institutional features of the environment. "Fixing" or incentivizing the faculty member without improving the environment for mission related activities is not sufficient. The authors provide a model for identifying areas that impact faculty productivity within a school, describing areas of greatest need, and developing institution-wide strategies to address those needs. Key features of a productive academic organizationIndividual features: adult development, socialization, motivation, content knowledge and research/teaching skills, vital network of professional communication, simultaneous projects, sufficient work time, orientation, autonomy and commitment, morale, work habits, mentors. Institutional features: career development, clear organizing goals, emphasizing priority goals, culture, positive group climate, assertive participative governance, decentralized organization, communication, resources including local peer support and technical support, salaries and other rewards, group size/age/ diversity, recruitment and selection, brokered opportunity structure Features of productive organizations: articles, grants, books, patients, enduring curricular change, educational innovations, quality teaching, artistic accomplishments, awards, prestige, highly motivated and satisfied faculty. Morahan P, Gold J, Bickel J. Status of Faculty Affairs and Faculty Development Offices in U.S. Medical Schools. Acad Med 2002;77:398-401 Jan 2000: Faculty affairs officers from 76 of 125 medical schools responded to an 8-page questionnaire with descriptions of functions and organization of activities of faculty affairs and faculty development. Most medical schools had at least one office devoted to faculty affairs functions and had been functioning for over 10 years. Faculty development offices have been established only more recently. Faculty development functions were less likely to have a predominant focus and to play a significant role within medical schools.
For more information on the AAMC, see the Faculty Affairs Forum (FAF) Simpson DE, Rediske VA, Beecher A, Bower D, Meurer L, Lawrence S, Wolkomir M. Understanding the Careers of Physician Educators in Family Medicine, Acad Med 2001;76:259-265 24 members of STFM were drawn from a randomly selected pool and screened for career satisfaction and contribution to medical education. Responses of semi-structured interviews were analyzed with an affinity diagram to reveal thematic categories of characteristics of these physician educators. Their career decisions emanated form an underlying set of values and beliefs associated with "making the world better." Three major sources of vitality-learners, colleagues, and patients-complemented the desire for challenging positions. Change was viewed as an opportunity and a source of stimulation, diversity and challenge. All struggled to balance personal and professional life and to make career choices consistent with their values. For more on faculty development for preceptors, see: Wilkerson W, Irby D. Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. (1998) Acad Med 73;387-396 Comprehensive faculty development empowers faculty members to excel as educators and to create vibrant academic communities that value teaching and learning.
For more on faculty development at the author's medical schools, see:
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Contact Us © 1995-2008 AAMC Terms and Conditions Privacy Statement |