|
 |
Planning for H1N1/Panflu and Other Infectious Disease Outbreaks
This document intends to assist CME planners, course directors and faculty
members in their planning for a possible pan-flu (e.g., H1N1) pandemic.
While current public health directives suggest that H1N1 is relatively
innocuous, a more serious outbreak may necessitate rapid consideration
and policy development. This planning guide is intended to help in that
process.
CME Planning Guide
Item
|
Background
|
Questions
|
| Communication |
Communication is key in any pandemic, perhaps especially in a communication-oriented
enterprise like CME. In this case, communication requires application
to (at least) two different groups:
First, frequent, direct communication between educational planners
and public health authorities (sometimes mediated through one medical
school contact) is critical. Second, and equally important, is the
concept that the CME office communicate regularly with registrants/learners,
faculty members, course planners, and others.
There are a variety of modalities which can work in this regard:
fax networks, broadcast e-mails, listserves, cell phone communication
devices, etc.
In addition, consideration needs to be given to the consistency
of messaging aligned with public health and academic medical center
messages. This requires coordination, and a fine balance between
over-alarming and underplaying real risks. This may be easier with
H1N1 as it appears at this stage; communication is more problematic
with SARS, and/or if H1N1 mutates to a more lethal form. Any information
via print or online materials produced by health authorities should
be adapted or distributed widely.
|
1. Does your office have a contact person in the Public Health
department or office? Who in the academic medical center does have
connections with the PH authority?
2. Do you routinely develop an e-mail list of all course registrants?
3. Do you or can you develop group e-mail lists based on courses
or other activities?
4. If not, do you have fallback procedures like broadcast-fax
or other capabilities?
5. Do you have a Web site to which you can post updates? Are these
updates clinically useful (perhaps linking to public health authorities)?
Are they educationally helpful?
|
| Educational Methods |
Proactive planning for H1N1 or similar epidemics from a CME perspective
requires a holistic and systematic review of learning objectives
for all planned educational activities.
If the objectives of a program are purely knowledge-based, consideration
can be given to alternative modalities, generally mediated by information
and communication technologies.
Online learning activities, for example, with slides and text,
and/or pre/post tests to ensure participation are acceptable alternatives.
Also possible are synchronous or asynchronous Webcast modifications.
Where learning objectives are more attitude- or application-based,
small group case discussion can occur over a phone line. Educational
activities using chat rooms also provide a forum for peer-peer dialogue,
knowledge uptake, and attitude-testing. Those courses offering simulations
and other real-time hands-on training may require different, protective
logistics -frequent equipment sanitization in mannequins for example.
Finally, in an instance in which a keynote or other speaker cannot
attend a conference because of panflu concerns, consider using audio
or videoconferencing.
|
1. Can your office begin a process that reviews upcoming courses
and other CME activities by location and by content, objectives,
and formats?
2. Can any of the content of these activities migrate to an electronic
format, e.g., Webcasting, online teaching and other handout materials?
3. Is there a business case for such migration? Is there a participant-risk
argument here?
4. If visiting speakers are hampered by flu or other restrictions,
can you bring them in by audio or videoconference? Does the meeting
facility have such a capacity?
5. Are simulations used in our CME activity? Consider frequent,
between-use sanitization procedures as advised by public health
authorities.
|
| On-site Activities |
Here, the advice of the PH authorities should be followed.
For courses, pre-registration information to registrants suggesting
they stay home if they are unwell is useful. At the event itself,
consideration may need to be given to: hand-washing facilities being
widely available; and/or having staff and others wear protective
approved face masks.
Consider the setting of the activity. On the one hand, hospital
venues may be considered more easily sanitized; hotel or other conference
facilities may not be accustomed to such activity. On the other
hand, hospitals and health care sites may restrict access to outsiders
and may themselves be sites in which infections are more likely.
|
1. Has the PH authority issued standard practices for group meeting?
2. Are your meeting planners and others aware of the practices?
3. Has the activity site been prepared for panflu risk reduction
(eg., provision of face masks, hand-washing techniques, video- or
audio-conferencing facilities, etc.)?
4. Have alternative site arrangements been considered?
|
| Business and Staff Considerations |
Given that most CME offices depend on a cost-recovery business
plan, any reconfiguration of services requires a thoughtful review
of budget practices, alternative funding sources, staff re-allocation,
partnerships with others (for example, the local IT or Web developer).
While potentially reducing usual registration fee income, careful
preparedness and alteration of educational methods (bringing in
a speaker in by videoconference for example), may in fact reduce
expenses.
Consideration can also be given to not charging late-cancellation
fees; though this may reduce income, the goodwill in an emergency
situation may have long-term benefits.
Finally, office staff and others need to abide by all usual precautions
and advice; policies may need to be developed, in concert with others
in the AMC, regarding absence from work and other issues.
|
1. Have you prepared a budget plan outlining a variety of scenarios
(recued registration, cancelled registration, alternative educational
methods)
2. Has your state or other authority offered financial help in
the even of business loss? Can you contact them to determine the
characteristics of support and manner of securing it?
3. Can you waive or create financial policies given the contingent
nature of panflu?
4. Do you have polices regarding staff illness and flu protection?
Have you ensured that they are aware of flu symptoms, treatment,
prevention, and policies?
|
Related Resources
Planning and preparedness:
About the flu:
Contact
For information on the content of this page, please contact Dave Davis,
M.D., FCFP, Senior Director, Continuing Education and Performance Improvement,
at 202-862-6275 or ddavis@aamc.org.
Updated: Sept. 28, 2009
|