AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Legislative Action Center

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

Health Reform

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Contact

 

Medicare IME and DGME Payments Associated with Resident Training at Nonhospital Sites

Current

Imbedded in the long term care hospital final rule published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) May 11 in the Federal Register is the final rule modifying CMS policies and regulations regarding Medicare direct GME (DGME) and indirect medical education (IME) reimbursement for residents training in nonhospital sites. The Medicare statute authorizes teaching hospitals to receive DGME and IME payments associated with residents training in nonhospital sites, such as physicians' offices, if they incur "all or substantially all" of the training costs. The policies are effective with hospital cost reporting periods beginning on or after July 1, 2007.

In 1999, CMS issued a regulation defining "all or substantially all" of the training costs as the residents' stipends and benefits plus physician supervisory costs. Since that time, CMS and the academic medical community have diverged in their views about how to handle "volunteer" physicians in determining whether there are physician supervisory costs. Relying on its interpretation of the "all or substantially all" statutory language, in a Q and A document published in 2005, CMS stated that "the issue of concern is not volunteerism, but whether there is a cost to the non-hospital site for supervising the residents." The academic medical community's view has been that if the physicians are volunteering their time, there are no supervisory costs.

The final rule reiterates the Agency's 2005 position regarding volunteer physicians, stating that in situations in which a teaching physician receives a predetermined salary that does not vary with the number of patients he or she treats, that salary is presumed to reflect some level of payment for supervision, which is a cost that the hospital must incur. However, the final rule does modify the regulatory definition of "all or substantially all" of the nonhospital site training costs to be 90 percent of the residents' stipends and benefits plus physician supervisory costs at the nonhospital site. The prior standard requires hospitals to incur 100 percent of these amounts.

The 2005 Q and A document also specified that the level of supervisory costs is determined by the teaching physician's salary and the amount of time that he or she spends on supervisory activities that do not involve patient care. Many teaching hospitals and nonhospital settings were frustrated with these requirements because they imposed significant compliance difficulties in a) obtaining actual physician salary data, and b) computing the amount of physician time spent supervising that does not involve patient care activities.

In recognition of these administrative hurdles, the proposed rule had given hospitals the option of using actual data or proxies for physician salary and nonpatient care-related teaching time. For example, teaching hospitals would have the option to use national physician salary data in calculating supervision costs. The proposal also would establish a "presumptive" level of time for supervising physician evaluation and didactic activities that hospitals and supervising physicians could use in calculating supervisory costs, rather than determining actual time levels for each physician at each site.

The final rule retains many of the provisions retained in the proposed rule, but does make some changes. For example, the final rule allows for the proration of physician supervision time when residents do partial week rotations. The final rule also provides flexibility to modify the hospital/nonhospital written agreements through June 30 of each academic year to reflect changing rotation arrangements and other situations. However, the final rule does not reduce the presumptive supervision time proxy of three hours, nor does it modify CMS's current positions regarding physician group practices and global agreements between teaching hospitals and medical schools.

In the final rule, CMS did express a willingness to look into a number of issues that were raised in the comments received, particularly the three hour per week physician supervision proxy and the use of physician work hours rather than nonhospital site hours of operation.

 

This page contains documents in Portable Document Format (PDF). The Adobe Acrobat® Reader® is required to view PDF documents. Download Acrobat® Reader®.

Related Resources

AAMC Documents

Contact Us    © 1995-2009 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement