AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Washington Highlights: October 16, 2009

Finance Committee Passes Health Care Reform Bill

The Senate Finance Committee Oct. 13 approved (14-9) its health care reform legislation, the America's Healthy Future Act. Sen. Olympia Snowe (Maine) was the only Republican to vote for the bill. Upon adoption, Committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.) called the $829 billion legislation a "balanced, common-sense bill" that will improve the "efficiency, quality, and coordination" of health care.

Shortly after the vote, Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) began meeting with Chairman Baucus, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), and senior White House officials to negotiate a merger of the health care reform bills passed by the Finance Committee and the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Sen. Dodd chaired the HELP Committee during the drafting and mark-up of its health reform bill, the "Affordable Health Choices Act" (S. 1679).

Prior to the Finance vote, the AAMC sent an Oct. 8 letter along with the College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, Association of Pathology Chairs, and the American Society for Investigative Pathology urging Senate leadership them to drop or significantly modify an amendment sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). The amendment, which was accepted by the Finance Committee, would change current law with respect to payment for certain molecular laboratory tests.

The Wyden provision would allow a select group of independent laboratories to bill Medicare directly within 14 days of the patient's discharge rather than through its existing DRG. Hospital-based laboratories, medical schools, and teaching hospitals would not qualify, even if they were performing the very same tests or a less costly but equally effective alternative. These laboratories would continue to be subject to the 14-day rule, creating the same barriers to testing and payment that the amendment seeks to address.

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Director, Federal Affairs
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

Len Marquez, Director
AAMC Government Relations
lmarquez@aamc.org
(202) 862-6281

AAMC Supports Medicare Physician Payment Legislation

AAMC President and CEO Darrell G. Kirch, M.D. sent an Oct. 15 letter of support for legislation that repeals Medicare's problematic Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) methodology. Introduced Oct. 14 by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.), the Medicare Physician Fairness Act of 2009 (S. 1776) also provides a foundation for further action on physician payment reform by setting a new budget baseline in 2010 that fully eliminates the 21.5 percent SGR deficit ($245 billion over 10 years). Under S.1776, future updates will be set at 0.0 percent, thereby preventing additional cuts during the development and implementation of a new payment formula. The bill does not preclude Congress (or a new formula) from replacing the freeze with positive updates.

Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) expects the full Senate to consider S. 1776 during the week of Oct. 19. The cost of S. 1776 was assumed in President Obama's budget. Since the bill does not offset the cost of repealing the SGR and halting physician payment cuts, at least 60 Senators must agree to waive budget rules before a final vote. Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) has indicated that he could not support such an approach.

In its letter of support, the AAMC praised S. 1776 as an "important first step toward achieving a more rational, consistent update methodology that appropriately reimburses physicians for their services." The letter also reiterated the AAMC's position that financing physician payment relief "through Medicare cuts that adversely affect medical schools or teaching hospitals would be self-defeating and unacceptable."

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Director, Federal Affairs
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

MedPAC Continues Graduate Medical Education Discussion

At its Oct. 8-9 meeting, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) continued its discussion on how Medicare payment policy might be used to support the types of medical education changes that would advance and support delivery system reforms. MedPAC included a chapter on this issue in its June 2009 Report to the Congress and commission recommendations are likely to be included in MedPAC's June 2010 report.

The commission heard a staff presentation that highlighted three areas for discussion: physician pipeline issues, delivery system reform issues, and economic inefficiencies. According to MedPAC staff, Medicare is not the best venue to address pipeline issues due to its focus on residency training; however, Medicare could funnel medical education funds into programs that more directly affect the specialty mix and practice location. To address some of the delivery system reform issues, staff suggested Medicare could provide incentives for graduate medical training to occur in "optimal training environments," where residents learn the skills to provide high-quality and efficient care. MedPAC staff also stated that there are "economic inefficiencies" because Medicare pays teaching hosptials indirect medical education (payments) that are above the so-called "empirical level."

At the end of the session, MedPAC Chair Glenn Hackbarth, J.D., provided his summary of the discussions and his views about what MedPAC should, and should not, focus on. He opined that MedPAC might not want to address the resident caps, specialty mix, or curriculum issues. He also stated that the commission might not want to take on the issue of all payer funding of medical education.

Chairman Hackbarth suggested that the commission could focus on "how we can get better output for the Medicare dollars about the [IME] empirical level." MedPAC staff also may look into whether funds should continue to go to the hospital general fund or directly to the residency programs, especially since this issue has led to disagreements among commissioners. In addition, Chairman Hackbarth expressed concern that continuing to tie Medicare payments to inpatient Medicare volume may not be the best way to address society's needs. Instead, he suggested that they can "be tied to the ability of programs to develop rich ambulatory environments to train their physicians."

Other sessions at the MedPAC meeting focused on:

  • Provider consolidation and prices;
  • Future work on the accuracy of pricing of services in the physician fee schedule;
  • Exploring the in-office ancillary exception to the physician self-referral; and
  • Case studies and metrics for high performing systems.

Information:
Karen Fisher, Sr. Director, Health Care Affairs
AAMC Health Care Affairs
kfisher@aamc.org
(202) 862-6140

Diana Mayes, Specialist
AAMC Health Care Affairs
dmayes@aamc.org
(202) 828-0498

CBO Releases Analysis on "Tort Reform"

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Oct. 9 released an analysis of the "effects of proposals to limit costs related to medical malpractice (tort reform)" at the request of Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). The report found that implementing a set of proposals (e.g., a $250,000 cap on awards for noneconomic damages and a $500,000 cap on awards for punitive damages) would reduce federal budget deficits by roughly $54 billion over the next 10 years and total mandatory health care spending by roughly $41 billion over 10 years. Further, CBO estimates that, if enacted, the set of proposals also would reduce total national premiums for medical liability insurance by about 10 percent.

In a press release, Sen. Hatch said, "I think this response from the CBO confirms that there is a growing problem regarding the costs of health care lawsuits." Continuing he stated, "I think that this is an important step in the right direction and these numbers show that this problem deserves more than lip service from policy-makers."

Information:
Travis W. Crytzer, Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
tcrytzer@aamc.org
(202) 828-0418

HIT Standards Committee Identifies Gaps, Announces Opportunity for Public Comment on Implementation Issues

The Health Information Technology (HIT) Standards Committee Oct. 14 heard update presentations from all four of its workgroups and announced a new opportunity for public participation in the committee's activities. The Implementation Workgroup stated that it would like to learn from the broader public about "real-world" standards implementation experiences and revealed plans to hold an Oct.29 hearing to take testimony from a broad spectrum of stakeholders. The committee also will open a two-week online forum following this hearing, to allow the public to engage in a period of "structured dialog" about adoption and implementation concerns.

The Clinical Operations Workgroup identified gaps the group believes the HIT Policy Committee should address, particularly regarding certain 2011 "meaningful use" criteria. The workgroup also launched a "Vocabulary" sub-workgroup to propose solutions on vocabulary and mapping issues and engaged the full committee in a discussion of requirements relating to patient access to electronic health records. The Privacy and Security Workgroup made two technical changes to their earlier recommendations and identified gaps to be addressed for 2013, including standard vocabulary for representing consumer consents. The committee also announced that the majority of its next meeting will be devoted to discussing security issues.

The meeting agenda and all slides from the workgroup presentations are available on the HIT Standards Committee Web site. A more detailed summary of the meeting will be posted to the AAMC HIT Web page.

Information:
Lori K. Mihalich-Levin, J.D., Senior Policy Analyst
AAMC Health Care Affairs
lmlevin@aamc.org
(202) 828-0599

On the Hill...

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-Fla.) Oct. 14 announced that he is resigning his House seat in January to become president of the Center for Middle East Peace & Economic Cooperation. Rep. Wexler is currently serving his seventh term and sits on the Foreign Affairs and Judiciary Committees.

On the Agenda in Washington

Oct. 19-20: Advisory Panel on Medical Uses of Isotopes Meeting
10:15 a.m.; Executive Boulevard Building (EBB01-B13/15), NRC, 6003 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD
Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will hold a partially closed meeting that will include a report from the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 103; an update on permanent prostate brachytherapy medical events; an update on results from the Society of Nuclear Medicine on the medical isotope shortage; information on the regulatory responsibilities of the Food and Drug Administration; and a summary of the enforcement process and enforcement actions against medical licensees.

Oct. 20: HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup Meeting
9 a.m. -3 p.m.; The Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, NW, Washington, DC
HIT Policy Committee Meeting's Information Exchange Workgroup will meet to hear testimony from invited experts and stakeholders in the area of electronic exchange of laboratory information.

Oct. 21: Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Health Care Fraud
10 a.m.; 226 Senate Dirksen Building
The full Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to hold a hearing titled "Effective Strategies for Preventing Health Care Fraud."

Oct. 26: National Research Advisory Council Meeting
8:30 a.m.; Room GL-20, Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 "Eye" St. NW, Washington, DC
National Research Advisory Council of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will hold a meeting to review the VA research portfolio and current budget allocations, as well as provide feedback on the direction/focus of VA's research initiatives.

Oct. 27-28: HIT Policy Committee
10 a.m.; The Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, NW, Washington, DC
The full HIT Policy Committee will meet to hear presentations from the Meaningful Use, Certification/Adoption, and Information Exchange Workgroups and will hear testimony from experts on the mapping of core Meaningful Use objectives and existing measures to medical specialties, small practices, and small hospitals.