AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Washington Highlights: February 8, 2008

Bush Releases FY 2009 Budget

President Bush released his FY 2009 budget Feb. 4. The $3.1 trillion spending plan, which includes a projected deficit of $407 billion for the coming year, proposes to increase discretionary spending (i.e., programs that receive funding through annual appropriations) by $46.2 billion (4.9 percent). But, as in the past several years, the Administration would direct almost all of this increase toward "security funding," proposing $594.5 billion for defense, homeland security, and international affairs, an increase of $44.9 billion (8.2 percent). All other discretionary programs would receive $393 billion, an increase of $1.3 billion (0.3 percent).

While overall domestic discretionary spending is essentially frozen at last year's levels, there are winners and losers in the President's budget plan. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) would be cut by $1.5 billion (2.1 percent) to $70.4 billion while the Department of Veterans Affairs is slated for a $5.3 billion (13.5 percent) increase.

The following is list of the President's proposals for discretionary programs of interest to medical schools and teaching hospitals.

National Institutes of Health: The President's budget requests $29.230 billion in discretionary budget authority for the National Institutes of Health through the Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations, which is equal to the FY 2008 appropriation. The budget also assumes $78 million though the Interior Appropriations Subcommittee for the transfer from the Superfund to the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), $150 million in mandatory appropriations for type I diabetes, and $8 million in evaluation funds for the National Library of Medicine (NLM), for a program level of $29.465 billion, the same as in FY 2008.

In addition, the budget proposes to transfer $300 million from NIH to the Global Fund for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. This is an increase of $5 million over the FY 2008 transfer.

According to the agency's Congressional Justification, the President's budget would support 9,757 new and competing renewal research project grants (RPGs), a decrease of 14 from FY 2008, and a total of 36,526 RPGs, an increase of 17 over last year. The budget proposes again to eliminate inflationary increases for RPGs. While the budget assumes no inflationary increases are provided for direct, recurring costs in non-competing RPG's, increases will be provided where NIH has committed to a programmatic increase in an award. The average cost of competing RPGs will remain at the FY 2008 level.

The President's budget proposes to increase support for research centers to $2,963 million, a 0.7 percent increase above the FY 2008 level, to provide program growth for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs).

For training, the budget proposes modest stipend increases of 1 percent for both pre- and post-doctoral fellows. Pre-doctoral fellows, who currently receive $20,772, have not seen a stipend increase since FY 2004. Post-doctoral fellows, who begin at $36,996, have not seen a stipend increase since FY 2006 (for 0 to 1 year of experience only). The budget would support 17,586 Full-Time Training Positions (FTTPs), an increase of 17 FTTPs over the FY 2008 level.

The budget once again proposes to reduce the cap on salaries on extramural grants to Executive Level II ($172,200 in 2008). Extramural salaries are currently capped at Executive Level I ($191,300 in 2008).

Health Professions: The President's budget eliminates funding for all Health Resources and Services Administration Title VII health professions programs ($194 million). For Title VIII nursing education programs, the President proposes $110 million, a $46 million (30 percent) cut.

Health Professions Student Loans: The President's budget request proposes a rescission of the "Federal portion of all the liquid assets" of the Health Professions Student Loan (HPSL), Primary Care Loan (PCL), Loans for Disadvantaged Students (LDS), and Nursing Student Loan (NSL). This rescission would require participating institutions to return the Federal capital contribution of revolving funds that have not yet been dedicated to students. The Federal capital contribution amounts to roughly 8/9ths of the institution's cash-on-hand, or as much as $4 million from participating institutions. The Administration estimates this proposal will recall over $100 million from the student loan programs. The President proposed this rescission in FY 2008, but the FY 2008 omnibus appropriations included a smaller, $15 million-rescission from the Title VII loan programs.

National Health Service Corps: The President's budget request includes a total of $121 million for the National Health Service Corps (NHSC), a $3 million (2.4 percent) decrease from the FY 2008 omnibus appropriations. The NHSC Recruitment allocation, which provides funding for the NHSC Scholarship and Loan Repayment Program awards, would be increased $11 million (13.1 percent) to $95 million. The budget proposes to decrease the NHSC Field allocation, which provides funding for recruitment and retention administrative functions, by $14 million (35 percent) to $26 million.

Children's Graduate Medical Education: The President's budget eliminates funding for the Children's Graduate Medical Education, which was funded at $302 million in FY 2008.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: The President's budget requests $325.7 million for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), an $8.9 million (2.7 percent) reduction. This request includes $30 million for comparative effectiveness research, as provided in FY 2008, and $32.1 million for patient safety research, a $2.1 million (6.1 percent) cut. As provided in FY 2008, the President requests $44.8 million for health information technology.

Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Care and Research: The President's budget includes $38.737 billion for Department of Veterans Affairs medical care, a $2 billion (5.5 percent) increase over the FY 2008 level. The President's budget incorporates funds previously allocated under Medical Administration into the Medical Services account. Within the VA medical care allotment, the budget allocates $34.076 billion for Medical Services, a $1.5 million (4.5 percent) increase over FY 2008 comparable level; and $4.661 billion for Medical Facilities, a $561 million (13.7 percent) increase over FY 2008.

The budget recommends $442 million for VA Medical and Prosthetics Research, a $38 million (7.9 percent) decrease from FY 2008.

National Science Foundation: The Administration's FY 2009 budget includes $6.3 billion for the National Science Foundation (NSF), an increase of $202 million (3.3 percent) over FY 2008. The Administration boosts Research and Related Activities to $5.6 billion, a $840 million (17.7 percent) increase.

Education: The President's budget for the Department of Education eliminates the Perkins loan forgiveness program for a total savings of $65 million. The budget also eliminates $1.1 billion in new Perkins federal capital contributions.

The President's budget also proposes legislative changes to programs created under the College Cost Reduction and Access Act. In particular, the budget would limit eligibility for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program to loans disbursed after July 1, 2009, instead of the statatory July 1, 2007, for a total savings of $1.464 billion. Additionally, the budget would eliminate a provision of the new Income-Based Repayment (IBR) program that requires the Secretary to pay interest that accrues on subsidized loans for the first 3 years of participation in IBR. The budget estimates this change would save approximately $457 million.

Information:
Dave Moore, Senior Director
AAMC Government Relations
dbmoore@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

Tannaz Rasouli, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
trasouli@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

Matthew Shick, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
mshick@aamc.org
(202) 862-6116

President's Medicare Proposal Cuts IME and Other Hospital Payments

The Administration's Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 budget seeks to slow Medicare's annual growth rate over 5 years (2009 - 2013) from 7.2 percent to 5.0 percent. It proposes to accomplish this by cutting $182.7 billion in Medicare funding over the same period. The cuts include a reduction (over 3 years) of indirect medical education (IME) add-on payments from 5.5 percent to 2.2 percent, for a savings of $12.9 billion over 5 years. The budget materials state that such action "rationalizes Medicare payment policies," and will "better align" the IME payment "with costs per case teaching hospitals may face." Similarly, the President's budget ends duplicate IME payments currently made under the Medicare Advantage program by eliminating the direct payments to hospitals (a savings of $8.85 billion over 5 years).

In a Feb. 4 statement following the budget's release, AAMC President Darrell Kirch, M.D., called upon Congress to "immediately reject these short-sighted recommendations," which threaten the ability of teaching hospitals "to provide the full spectrum of patient care and treatment." He also warned that the cuts would "impede the progress" that teaching hospitals have made "in advancing the health of all Americans through education and medical research."

Other proposed cuts directly affecting teaching hospitals include:

  • A zero percent update for inpatient and outpatient services in FYs 2009 - 2011, followed by a 0.65 percent market basket reduction annually thereafter (estimated to saves $64.2 billion and $6.05 billion, respectively, over 5 years);
  • A 30 percent reduction in Medicare disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments over 2 years (saves $20.69 billion over 5 years);
  • The elimination of bad debt reimbursement for all providers over 4 years (saves $8.46 billion over 5 years);
  • A 5 percent reduction in hospital capital payments in FY 2009 (saves $3.05 billion over 5 years);
  • The elimination of payments for "never events" (saves $190 million over 5 years); and
  • Establishment of a hospital value-based purchasing program (no details available; saves $1.65 billion over 5 years).

The President's budget proposal also reduces updates for long-term care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, hospices, home health agencies, ambulatory surgery centers, and ambulance services. The Administration's Medicare proposals do not address the reduction in physician payments scheduled for July 1.

In a Feb. 4 statement on the budget, Sen. Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said that the Medicare cuts were "dead on arrival with me and with most of the Congress." House Ways and Means Committee Chair Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) issued a Feb. 4 press release stating that the President's proposed Medicare cuts "would threaten coverage for millions, force the closure of hospitals, and discourage other healthcare providers from serving seniors or elderly patients." House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair John Dingell (D-Mich.) criticized the budget proposal for including "crippling cuts to the agencies charged with protecting the health and well-being of our nation."

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Director, Federal Affairs
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

President's Budget Addresses "Medicare Funding Warning"

As mandated by the "Medicare Modernization Act" (MMA), President Bush's Fiscal Year FY 2009 budget includes a proposal to prevent general-fund revenues from exceeding 45 percent of all Medicare expenditures. Under the MMA, the Medicare Trustees must issue a "Medicare Funding Warning" if they project that general-fund revenues will exceed the 45 percent threshold within the next 6 years. If the Trustees issue two consecutive warnings, as they did in 2006 and 2007, the President must, in the following year, include in his next budget (FY 2009) a proposal to prevent general revenues from exceeding the threshold.

In his FY 2009 budget, President Bush partly addresses the consecutive Medicare Funding Warnings by cutting $182.7 billion in Medicare funding (see related article). Additionally, his budget proposes a 0.4 percent cut to all provider payments once general fund contributions to Medicare exceed 45 percent of program expenditures. According to budget materials from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), provider payments would "continue to be reduced by an additional [0.4 percent]" annually until general-fund revenues accounted for less than 45 percent of Medicare expenditures. The OMB materials state that the proposal "is intended to encourage the Congress and the Administration to reach agreement on reforms needed to slow the growth in program costs."

Congress must consider the President's plan and may also take up their own legislative alternatives. Ultimately, they are not required to pass any legislation related to the Medicare Funding Warning.

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Director, Federal Affairs
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

President's Budget Cuts Medicaid, Reauthorizes SCHIP

The President's FY 2009 budget seeks to slow the growth of Medicaid expenditures from 7.4 percent to 7.1 percent over 5 years. The budget's legislative proposals would cut Medicaid funding by $17.4 billion over 5 years, while its administrative proposals would cut $800 million over the same period. The Administration's wide-ranging Medicaid proposals address long-term care, prescription drug benefits, and other aspects of the program, including several of potential interest to AAMC members:

  • Greater state flexibility regarding the enrollment of special populations in managed care programs (estimated to save $2.1 billion over 5 years);
  • Implementation of performance-based payments of Federal Medicaid grant awards (saves $310 million over 5 years);
  • A mandated "National Correct Coding Initiative" to prevent improper billing by providers (saves $105 million over 5 years);
  • A regulation to "remove ambiguity" about which additional services may be funded by cost savings associated with Medicaid managed care plans (saves $800 million over 5 years); and
  • A regulation to codify the Medicaid "free care" policy prohibiting providers from billing for services that are offered to the public and other payers at no cost (no savings identified).

Additionally, the FY 2009 budget includes several proposals affecting the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP):

  • Reauthorizes SCHIP through FY 2013 (at a cost of $19.7 billion over 5 years);
  • Limits coverage to children at or below 200 percent of the Federal poverty level, which was, according to the budget materials, what the program "originally intended";
  • Establishes outreach grants to support enrollment initiatives (a cost of $50 million in FY 2009 and $100 million in each of FYs 2010 - 2014; and
  • Clarifies what counts as "income" when determining enrollment eligibility

According to the budget materials, the SCHIP proposal would cover 5.6 million low-income children by FY 2013 and nearly nine million at some time during the year.

In a Feb. 4 response to the budget proposal, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair John Dingell (D-Mich.) stated that it "fails to provide sufficient funding to maintain SCHIP at current coverage levels and does nothing to reduce the number of uninsured children."

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Director, Federal Affairs
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

FY 2009 Budget Proposal Outlines Healthcare Reforms

The President's FY 2009 budget outlines various reforms that "are designed to give all Americans access to affordable health care and to address the cost pressures healthcare places on the economy and the Federal budget." He proposes elimination of the tax exclusion for employor-sponsored insurance and the implementation of a standard health insurance tax deduction ($7,500 for individuals and $15,000 for families). The President also proposes a restructuring of the health insurance market by: promoting collective purchasing of lower-priced coverage through "association health plans"; allowing a multi-state insurance market; and reforming medical liability law.

The FY 2009 budget assumes a $75 million dollar increase in both 2009 and 2010 funding for state high-risk pools. It also re-proposes the redirection of certain "subsidies and payments" (presumably Medicare and Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments) to support state-based coverage initiatives. According to materials from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), "a portion" of the "separate payments that subsidize a provider's operating expenses or...uncompensated care" should be "redirected to help people with poor health or limited income afford health insurance."

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Director, Federal Affairs
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

AAMC, Health Professions Groups Hold Title VII Capitol Hill Day

More than two dozen health professions leaders representing the range of disciplines supported by the Title VII and VIII programs Feb. 7 participated in a congressional advocacy day, organized by the Health Professions and Nursing Education Coalition (HPNEC). The day centered around a congressional "open house," in which participants designed exhibits to help clarify the programs' missions for congressional staff. Participants also visited congressional offices to urge full funding for the health professions training programs, which were cut by 51 percent in FY 2006.

A lunch briefing for participants and Congressional staff featured a presentation by former U.S. Surgeon General David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D., currently at Morehouse School of Medicine. Dr. Satcher emphasized, "If it weren't for Title VII, if it weren't for Title VIII, we would not have had providers for existing community health centers, let alone for their expansion." He continued, "When you cut programs like Title VII ... you are moving the country closer and closer to inequity, and chipping away at the commitment to eliminated health disparities."

Other panelists included: Denise V. Rodgers, M.D., Executive Vice President, Academic and Clinical Affairs, The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ); Mary H. Hill, DSN, R.N., Associate Dean, Division of Nursing, Howard University College of Pharmacy, Nursing, and Allied Health Sciences; and Thomas Cavalieri, D.O., Interim Dean, UMDNJ School of Osteopathic Medicine.

The AAMC coordinates HPNEC, which is an alliance of more than 70 national organizations representing providers, institutions, and community partnerships dedicated to educating the nation's health personnel.

Information:
Tannaz Rasouli, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
trasouli@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

Abigail Schopick, Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
aschopick@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

House Passes HEA Reauthorization

The House of Representatives Feb. 7 passed (354-58) "College Opportunity and Affordability Act of 2007" (H.R. 4137) to reauthorize the Higher Education Act (HEA) through 2012. H.R. 4137 contains several changes, new programs, and studies of importance to medical education.

In the area of student financial aid and loan forgiveness, the House bill provides:

  • An increase the annual Perkins loan limit for graduate/professional students from $6,000 to $8,000 and a corresponding increase in the aggregate Perkins loan limit for graduate/professional students from $40,000 to $60,000;
  • A new $10,000 loan forgiveness program for "medical specialists" who have been accepted to, or currently participate in, an ACGME-accredited graduate medical education training program or fellowship that requires more than 5 years of total graduate medical training and has fewer U.S. medical school graduate applicants than the total number of positions available under these programs;
  • A 6-month grace period for repayment of GradPLUS loans;
  • Direction for the Department of Education to work with the Department of the Treasury to enhance the financial literacy of students at institutions of higher education through the development of initiatives, programs, and curricula;
  • A requirement that institutions to certify private educational loans and to provide information on available federal alternatives; and
    The "student loan sunshine" language that addresses financial aid administrator-lender relationships [see Washington Highlights, Nov. 17, 2007].

The House bill also includes a Government Accountability Office study on education related indebtedness of medical school graduates that was offered by Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) and Rep. Charles Boustany (R-La.) during the House Education and Labor Committee mark up.

H.R. 4137 authorizes new education funding and grant programs, including:

  • Expanded eligibility for Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need (GAANN) institutional grants that would require the Secretary of Education to consider "an assessment of current and future professional workforce needs of the United States," which is expected to allow medical and nursing education to now qualify;
  • A requirement that States provide financial support for public institutions of higher education at a level equal or greater than either the State's average contribution during the 5 most recent preceding academic years, or the amount provided in the previous academic year; and
  • New grants to medical and nursing schools to "assist in providing courses for instruction that specifically equip students to understand the causes and remedies for medical error, medically-induced patient injuries and complications, and other defects in medical care; engage effectively in personal and systemic efforts to continually reduce medical harm; and improve patient care and outcomes, as recommended by the Institute of Medicine."

H.R. 4137 also requires accrediting agencies to apply and enforce standards that "respect the stated mission of the institution of higher education, including religious missions." However, report language accompanying the bill states the intent of the Committee that "this amendment does not change or alter current accreditation requirements, and the exemptions included in those requirements, for training professionals in the practice of medicine and other health care professions."

Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) withdrew an amendment he planned to offer that would have required institutions of higher education (including medical schools) with endowments valued greater than $500 million to spend at least 5 percent of their endowment assets each year. The House approved a second amendment offered by Rep. Welch that will require "annual reporting on how much of these endowment is paid out each year for the purpose of containing college costs."

The Senate July 24, 2007, unanimously passed their version of the reauthorization bill [see Washington Highlights, July 27, 2007]. Current authority for the HEA expired on Sept. 30, 2003; however, several extensions have been enacted, making few policy changes but allowing uninterrupted administration of the programs authorized under the law. The most recent extension (P.L. 110-109) is set to expire on March 31, 2008.

The White House Feb. 6 issued a Statement of Administration Policy that "strongly opposed" H.R. 4137, but stopped short of threatening a veto. The White House cited numerous objections, foremost among them a prohibition of the U.S. Education Department from issuing federal regulations governing higher education accreditation.

Information:
Matthew Shick, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
mshick@aamc.org
(202) 862-6116

Negotiated Rulemaking Committee Examines CCRAA Proposed Regulations

The Department of Education's Negotiating Rulemaking Committee on student loans Feb. 4-6 met to discuss the draft proposed regulations for certain provisions of the "College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007" (CCRAA, P.L. 110-84). Carrie Steere-Salazar, Chair of the AAMC Committee on Student Financial Assistance (COSFA), represents the AAMC and graduate/professional schools on the committee.

The draft regulations retain the debt-to-income ratio (20/220) pathway of the Economic Hardship Deferment, despite its statutory elimination under the CCRAA. Committee members also examined the implementation of the new income based repayment and public service loan forgiveness programs, both of which are effective July 1, 2009. The Department of Education agreed to revisit the following issues:

  • The definition of "full time" and "public service" employment that qualifies for loan forgiveness;
  • The monthly loan payment distribution for joint-filing married borrowers that participate in the income-based repayment; and
  • The definition of a not-for-profit lender.

Additional information is available on the Department's negotiated rulemaking website. The Department has scheduled the final negotiated rulemaking session for March 3-5 in Washington, DC.

Information:
Matthew Shick, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
mshick@aamc.org
(202) 862-6116

Higher Education Associations Issue New Statement on Patent Reform

A coalition of the AAMC, the Association of American Universities (AAU), the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges (NASULGC), the Council on Governmental Relations (COGR), and the American Council on Education (ACE), Feb. 5 released a revised statement and reaffirmed support for legislative reform of the U.S. patent system in line with recommendations by the National Academies in 2004. In a Feb.5 letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Ranking Member Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), the coalition commended the legislators for revising the Patent Reform Act (S. 1145) to be more compatible with the needs of publicly supported academic research and the transfer of university research into commercial applications.

The coalition further notes that certain provisions of S. 1145 remain problematic for universities. These provisions include:

  • An extensive "second window" for challenging new patents within the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO);
  • A revised formula that would tend to minimize the calculation of economic damages from patent infringement (thus making some university patents less attractive to potential licensees); and
  • A statutory mandate that patent applicants complete exhaustive searches of "prior art" with increased liability for failure to identify all relevant prior art.

The coalition statement responds to another organization's claims that recent revisions to S. 1145 in committee had satisfactorily addressed all of the coalition's concerns.

Senate leadership has indicated that it would like the bill to move for a vote early in the current session. The House passed a companion bill (H.R. 1908) [see Washington Highlights, Sept. 14]. The higher education associations urge "all parties to continue to work in good faith to seek effective, balanced resolutions to the relatively few, but critical, remaining issues so that this important legislation can be passed into law."

Information:
Stephen Heinig, Lead Science Policy Analyst
AAMC Biomedical Health Sciences Research
sheinig@aamc.org
(202) 828-0488

Susan Ehringhaus, Sr. Director & Regulatory Counsel
AAMC Biomedical Health Sciences Research
sehringhaus@aamc.org
(202) 828-0543