AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Washington Highlights: March 11, 2005

House, Senate Panels Craft Budget Plans

The House Budget Committee March 9 approved an FY 2006 budget resolution that calls for $69 billion in mandatory spending reductions over 5 years - about $18 billion more that the Administration requested in its budget. The committee approved the resolution 22 - 15. Meanwhile, the budget resolution the Senate Budget Committee March 10 approved a call for $32 billion in mandatory savings over 5 years.

The House bill directs the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee to find savings of $20 billion and $18.7 billion, respectively, over five years. The bill does not specify where the cuts must come from, but the Committees must find savings in programs within their jurisdiction. Programmatic jurisdictions of the House Energy and Commerce Committee include Medicaid, Medicare outpatient services and the drug benefit, the environment and others; The House Ways and Means Committee has jurisdiction over Medicare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, welfare, child care and unemployment insurance. Given the size of both the Medicare and Medicaid program, it is likely that the savings could be achieved through these programs.

The Senate budget bill directs the Senate Finance Committee to find $15 billion in savings, primarily through Medicaid by June 6, 2005. According to Senate Budget Committee Chairman Judd Gregg's (R-N.H.) budget mark summary, "The Committee notes that there is great potential for savings in the Medicaid program due to waste and abuse in the system…. As the Finance Committee considers this legislation, the Budget Committee points out that at least 34 states are estimated to be receiving up to $6 billion a year in federal Medicaid dollars inappropriately." The instructions do not prevent the committee from finding savings in Medicare.

The Senate mark also includes a reserve fund to "improve health care quality through the adoption of health information technology and performance-based payments that are based on accepted clinical performance measures." Another reserve fund would establish a "deficit neutral reserve fund for committees of jurisdiction (HELP and Finance) to pass legislation that addresses health care costs, reduces the number of uninsured, or improves access to care."

Both the House and Senate budget resolution limit discretionary spending to $843 billion, a 2.1 percent increase as requested in the President's budget. Both resolutions also include a $50 billion contingency fund for FY 2006 to fund ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The House resolution assumes the President's requested level of $391 billion for "non-security" discretionary spending, a 0.8 percent reduction. Within this total, the resolution assumes $50.9 billion for discretionary health programs, which are categorized in the budget as Function 550. After factoring out one-time costs related to Bioshield in FY 2005, this represents a reduction of 1.8 percent. The actual FY 2006 funding levels for discretionary health programs will be determined by the appropriations committees, which are not bound by the functional totals in the resolution. However, the appropriators will have to abide by the overall spending limit set by the resolution.

In the area of education, both the House and Senate resolutions call for reductions in the government subsidies provided to lenders in the federal student loan programs. The House resolution calls on the Education and the Workforce Committee to come up with $21 billion in savings over 5 years, about a third of which is estimated to come from the loan programs. The House resolution directs a majority of the savings toward reducing the deficit; the Senate resolution calls for savings to be used to retire the Pell Grant shortfall and create a $5.5 billion reserve fund that Congress could use to increase borrower benefits during the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act.

The House Budget Committee only accepted one amendment, a proposal by Rep. Jeb Bradley (R-N.H.) to shift $1.15 billion in discretionary spending from the international affairs account to veterans' programs over 5 years.

Information:
Dave Moore, Senior Director
AAMC Government Relations
dbmoore@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525 (discretionary budget), or

Lynne Davis Boyle, Assistant Vice President
AAMC Government Relations
ldavisboyle@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526 (mandatory budget)

MedPAC, Hospital Leaders Recommend Extending Moratorium on Niche Hospitals, Closing of Stark Loophole

During March 8 Congressional hearings, representatives from the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and not-for-profit and for-profit community hospitals urged members of the Senate Finance Committee and House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee to extend the current moratorium on physician-owned specialty hospitals. In addition, community hospital leaders recommended that the current loophole known as the Stark "whole hospital" exception be closed to prevent physicians referring to entities in which they have ownership.

In response to the Medicare Modernization Act's directions for MedPAC and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to report to Congress on certain issues related to physician owned specialty hospitals, MedPAC Chairman Glenn Hackbarth and Thomas Gustafson, Ph.D., deputy director of the Center for Medicare Management at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), discussed in their testimony the study findings and related recommendations.

While the CMS findings are preliminary and the results have yet to be released, both studies found that specialty hospitals treat less severely ill patients and provide less uncompensated care than community hospitals. In addition, both identified that the current payment system includes large differences in profitability across severity classes within diagnostic related groups (DRGs), which might create financial incentives to select low severity patients.

In addition, MedPAC found that specialty hospitals do not have lower costs for Medicare patients, but do have shorter lengths of stay and that community hospitals have so far been able to compete with specialty hospitals without suffering financially. The CMS report also found that a majority of Medicare patients in most specialty hospitals are referred or admitted by a physician owner; the quality of care was at least as good at a specialty hospital; and patient satisfaction is high.

Based on its findings, MedPAC recommends that the moratorium be extended from June 8, 2005 until Jan. 1 2007 to allow Congress and the Secretary work to improve payment accuracy in the hospital inpatient prospective payment system by adjusting the diagnostic related groups. In addition, the report recommends that Congress grant the Secretary the authority to allow gainsharing agreements between physicians and hospitals and to regulate those arrangements to protect the quality of care and minimize financial incentives that could affect physician referrals.
In response to questioning, Dr. Gustafson clarified that the administration did not have a position on the moratorium extension. Dr. Gustafson reminded the committees that CMS had included in President Bush's FY 2006 budget a statement indicating it would propose refining DRGs to address the specialty hospital issue.

The second panel, consisting of physicians and representatives from community and specialty hospitals, disagreed over whether or not the moratorium should be extended and whether the Stark whole hospital exception loophole should be closed. Representatives from community for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals detailed to the Senate Finance Committee and House Ways and Means Health Subcommittee why physician self-referrals to physician-owned, limited-service hospitals threatens patient access to critical health care services, and urged legislators to close the loophole in federal law used to justify the activity. The panelists also disagreed over whether DRGs should be refined.

Testifying at the Senate Finance Committee hearing were past president of the American Surgical Hospital Association and PSC Health Inc. Chief Executive Officer, Alan Pierott, M.D.; Lookout Memorial Hospital CEO Larry Veitz; and Oklahoma University Medical Center Chief Medical Officer J. Andy Sullivan, M.D. Testifying at the House Ways and Means health subcommittee hearing were representatives from St. David's Healthcare Partnership, the American Medical Association, Cedars-Sinai Hospital, MedCath Corporation, and Baylor Healthcare System.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) stated at the hearing that he and ranking member Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) are drafting legislation to address physician-owned specialty hospitals. He later clarified that the legislation would close a loophole in the federal self-referral law, known as Stark.

Information:
Lynne Davis Boyle, Assistant Vice President
AAMC Government Relations
ldavisboyle@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

PPAC Addresses Medicare Contractor Reforms, Other Issues

The Practicing Physicians Advisory Council (PPAC) met March 7 to address a variety of Medicare activities underway by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), including contractor reform activities, the proposed rule for competitive bidding on drugs, preliminary information about the Calendar Year (CY) 2006 physician fee schedule rule, and pay-for-performance initiatives. PPAC serves as the physician's advisory board to Medicare.

CMS representatives reported that CMS will be will be conducting full and open competitions for new "Medicare Administrative Contractors" (MACs), as mandated by the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003. Three types of MAC contractors will process fee for service claims for 1) Parts A and B, 2) home health, and 3) durable medical equipment. These changes are scheduled to be fully implemented by 2011. The planned reform will make use of standard contracting principles such as competition and performance incentives. More details about contractor reform, including the most recent report to Congress and an opportunity to submit comments, can be found on the CMS Web site.

CMS also reported on its proposed rule for the "Competitive Acquisition Program" (CAP) for Medicare Part B drugs and biologicals, as required under the MMA. Beginning Jan. 1, 2006, this voluntary program will provide an option for physicians to purchase covered medications from vendors selected through a competitive bidding process or be paid under the average sales price system for directly purchased drugs. Final comments are due by April 25.

In a presentation on the 2006 physician fee schedule, CMS noted that the work relative value unit (WRVU) component of the physician fee schedule is scheduled for its mandated 5-year review. Currently, over 800 codes have been submitted by CMS and specialty societies for review by the relevant AMA committees and CPT Panel. Revised work RVUs will be incorporated into the 2007 fee schedule.

CMS reviewed several pay-for-performance and quality initiatives that are currently in process or being planned, including the Physician Group Practice (PGP) demonstration.

Information:
Mary Patton, Senior Research Associate
AAMC Division of Health Care Affairs
mpatton@aamc.org
(202) 862-6297

Denise Dodero, Sr. Director, Health Care Affairs
AAMC Health Care Affairs
ddodero@aamc.org
(202) 828-0493

Senate Committee Passes Patient Safety Legislation

The Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee March 9 passed patient safety legislation that would establish a voluntary and confidential reporting system in support of initiatives to reduce preventable medical errors. The "Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005" (S. 544) is based on legislation that was approved by the Senate in the 108th Congress (S. 720). The House passed similar legislation last year; however, the House and Senate did not reconcile subtle differences between the two bills before the 108th Congress adjourned.

By granting legal protections for reported data, S. 544 would encourage providers to report medical errors or "near misses" to "Patient Safety Organizations" (PSOs). The PSOs would compile and analyze the data with the intent of developing and disseminating "best practices" that could avoid subsequent errors and improve healthcare quality.

Information:
Christiane Mitchell, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

On the Hill

Doris Matsui (D-Calif.) became the newest member of the House of Representatives, winning a March 8 special election to succeed her husband, Robert Matsui (D-Calif.), who passed away Jan. 1. Rep. Matsui, a former deputy director of public liaison in the Clinton Administration and lobbyist, was sworn in on March 10 and is expected to be assigned a seat on the House Rules Committee. Rep. Matsui's election brings the party breakdown in the House to 232 Republicans, 202 Democrats, and 1 Independent.