AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > July 2, 2004

House Rejects Spending And Budget Proposals

July 2, 2004 - The House of Representatives June 24 turned back two proposals with significant consequences for funding programs important to medical schools and teaching hospitals. The House rejected by a 184 to 230 vote a resolution offered by Rep. David Obey (D-Wis.) to increase the FY 2005 discretionary spending cap by reducing tax breaks for those individuals with incomes over $1 million. The measure the House rejected was a resolution revising the FY 2005 budget resolution (S.Con.Res. 95) as it applies in the House. The Obey amendment would have provided the House Appropriations Committee with an additional $14.2 billion for FY 2005 appropriations. Mr. Obey, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, proposed to use a portion of the additional funds to increase the NIH budget and restore the Administration's proposed cuts in Title VII health professions funding.

Shortly after midnight, House appropriators joined forces with almost all Democrats in decisively defeating an effort to revise the congressional budget process. The final vote on the "Spending Control Act of 2004" (H.R. 4663), sponsored by House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle (R-Iowa), was 146 to 268. The bill, championed by conservative Republicans dissatisfied that the congressional budget resolution passed earlier in the year does not go far enough to control federal spending, would have reinstituted statutory caps on discretionary spending for 2 years, and revived "pay-as-you-go" rules requiring legislation to increase entitlement spending be offset by decreases in other entitlement programs. The House spent little time debating Chairman Nussle's bill, which was a revised version of the bill (H.R. 3973) approved by the House Budget Committee in March. Most of the attention focused on a wide-ranging series of amendments, all of which were defeated or withdrawn.

In a June 3 letter to all members of the House of Representatives, AAMC President Jordan Cohen, M.D., expressed opposition to H.R. 3973, describing the cap on discretionary spending and the limit on Congress' ability to expand entitlement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid "detrimental to our nation's health care system." Despite the bill's defeat, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) said the debate would set the stage for a more serious budget overhaul proposal in the next Congress.

Information:

Dave Moore, Senior Director
AAMC Government Relations
dbmoore@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement