AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > July 2, 2004

Second House Subcommittee Examines Hospital Billing and Collection Policies

July 2, 2004 - Representatives from healthcare systems, consumer groups, and policy research organizations addressed various concerns regarding hospital billing and collection practices related to the uninsured at a June 24 hearing before the Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. The Ways and Means Subcommittee on Oversight conducted a similar hearing on June 22 [see Washington Highlights, June 25].

In a statement issued the day of the hearing, Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas) reported he was "encouraged" that the hospital industry had "taken recent steps to revisit and enhance" billing and collection practices. "However," he warned, "we all know policies can be little more than talk…the proof is in the results." Chairman Barton said he looked forward to hearing "how your commitments have taken action" in terms of helping uninsured patients meet their "fair [financial] obligations" in a "fair and respectful manner."

Similarly, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Jim Greenwood (R-Pa.) challenged the hospital industry to uniformly adopt the billing/collection principles and guidelines issued by the American Hospital Association (AHA) earlier this year. He suggested that widespread adoption of reasonable practices might avert legislative action on the issue.

Praising the adoption of the AHA principles and guidelines as a good first step, witnesses from the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and The Access Project (an advocacy group affiliated with the Brandeis University School for Social Policy and Management) proposed further strategies for easing the financial pressures faced by poor, uninsured patients. Hopkins Professor Gerard Anderson, Ph.D., supported a change in the methodology used to set hospital charges. Dr. Anderson suggested that charges reflect Medicare levels, plus 25 percent. He explained the level "is above what insurers are paying…it is a reasonable amount," adding that such a methodology "is transparent" and "easy to monitor and verify."

Mark Rukevina from the Access Project argued that hospitals should offer uninsured patients the same discounts extended to insured patients. He added that all hospitals should screen uninsured patients for public assistance eligibility, and partner with patient advocacy groups to educate needy patients about charity care and other payment options available in the community. "Hospitals must take a proactive role in informing their patients of charity care," Mr. Rukevina advised, "and they must stop aggressive collection actions against uninsured patients." Additionally, Mr. Rukevina challenged the AHA to "build upon" its guidelines and principles by developing a financial assistance initiative for uninsured patients. He also recommended that hospitals be held accountable for how they spend Medicaid DSH payments and other uncompensated care funds.

Herbert Pardes, M.D., president and CEO of New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia Presbyterian Campus and former chairman of the AAMC, also testified before the Subcommittee. Dr. Pardes provided an overview of his organization's billing policies, including a commitment to providing free care or reduced charges for individuals with incomes below 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Level. Tenet Healthcare Corporation President and CEO Trevor Fetter informed the Subcommittee that his organization was pursuing a new billing policy for the uninsured in which charges would reflect 75 percent of average managed care rates. Similarly, HCA Chairman and CEO Jack Bovender, Jr., reported that his company was considering setting rates for the uninsured at 95 percent of managed care rates. Both explained that such changes represented long-term, not immediate, strategies. Arguing that coverage was the best way to assure individuals could pay for their healthcare, Mr. Bovender also expressed support for mandated employer coverage and health insurance for the unemployed.

Information:

Christiane Mitchell, Senior Legislative Analyst
AAMC Government Relations
cmitchell@aamc.org
(202) 828-0526

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement