AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > February 13, 2004

OIG Issues Advisory Opinion Related to a Clinical Trial

February 13, 2004 - The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Feb. 9 posted Advisory Opinion 04-01, concerning the waiver of Part B cost-sharing obligations for equipment and supplies used by Medicare beneficiaries to monitor blood glucose levels in a clinical trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Advisory Opinion analyzes a clinical trial that is intended to investigate the best medical approaches for addressing coronary artery disease in people with Type II diabetes. It will compare the effectiveness of two different drug therapies, and also compare the effectiveness of drug therapy combined with early surgery to drug therapy alone. All patients in the trial will be required to self-monitor their blood glucose levels. All supplies for the blood glucose monitoring will be provided to enrolled patients without charge through an agreement between the National Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute (NHLBI) and a specified manufacturer.

While the OIG analysis indicates that the arrangement may implicate section 1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act and the anti-kickback statute, the agency concludes that penalties would not be imposed "since the Proposed Arrangement reasonably accommodates the needs of an important, government-sponsored scientific study without posing a significant risk of fraud and abuse."

The OIG distinguishes this clinical trial from commercial or private studies by commenting "since commercial or private studies pose significantly different risks under the NCD and the Medicare fraud and abuse authorities, routine waivers of cost-sharing obligations to enrollees in such studies would not necessarily be sheltered from civil monetary penalties…or sanction under the anti-kickback statute, absent an applicable exception."

Information:

Ivy Baer, Director & Regulatory Counsel
AAMC Health Care Affairs
ibaer@aamc.orc
(202) 828-0490

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement