AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > December 5, 2003

AAMC and FASEB Comment on "Regulatory Peer Review"

December 5, 2003 - The AAMC and the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) sent a comment letter (PDF, 5 pages - 146KB) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) this week objecting to proposed requirements for peer review of information supporting major federal regulations and related actions [68 Federal Register 54023]. The OMB proposal would establish standards for regulatory peer review and also would require agencies to undertake an additional level of review for information deemed to be "especially significant," i.e., meeting certain economic and other criteria. The OMB explicitly noted that the new requirements are not intended to apply to reviews of research applications or other routine operations such as conducted by National Institutes of Health (NIH) or National Science Foundation (NSF).

The heart of AAMC's and FASEB's concerns is that the additional layer of review and other strictures set out by OMB would seriously encumber timely decision making by Public Health Service (PHS) agencies. The letter cites as one example the recent release of findings that hormone replacement therapy for post-menopausal women is of minimal benefit and causes troubling adverse effects, contrary to previous medical opinion. The AAMC and FASEB believe that PHS agencies currently rely on exemplary standards for scientific review in their operations, and the imposition of additional layers of review by OMB would seriously undermine the public health prerogative of these agencies. The two organizations also argue that OMB's specific review and reporting requirements contravene "generally respected, widely emulated practices…in determining scientific merit." The AAMC and FASEB affirm support for OMB's goal to ensure that major federal actions are based on sound science, but urge the OMB to identify and address systemic deficiencies where they occur, and not to impose "one-size-fits-all" processes on all federal agencies. OMB's deadline for public comments is Dec. 15.

Information:
Stephen Heinig, Senior Research Fellow
AAMC Biomedical Health Sciences Research
sheinig@aamc.org
(202) 828-0488

This page contains documents in Portable Document Format (PDF). The Adobe Acrobat® Reader® is required to view PDF documents. Download Acrobat® Reader®.

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement