AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > February 7, 2003

Congress Approves Another FY 2003 Funding Extension; White House Threatens Veto

February 7, 2003 - Facing increasing pressure from its leadership to finish the FY 2003 budget before the President's Day recess, Congress Feb. 5 passed another continuing resolution (CR) to keep federal programs operating at FY 2002 levels. The new CR (H.J.Res. 18), which runs through Feb. 20, is the eighth funding extension needed this fiscal year because Congress has approved only two of the 13 annual appropriations bills.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) added his voice to the calls for a year-long CR at FY 2002 levels if Congress does not finish the FY 2003 bill by Feb. 14. Stevens said Feb. 5 he would support a final CR through Sept. 30 if conferees cannot settle their differences by the start of the President's Day recess. Sen. Stevens's comments echo House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle (R-Iowa), who threatened last week to introduce a year-long CR to keep pressure on the negotiations.

House and Senate conferees on the FY 2003 omnibus appropriations bill (H.J.Res. 2) are tentatively scheduled to meet publicly Feb. 10 to finalize the package. However, the negotiators have not reached agreement on several key points in the bill, including the size of the across-the-board cut proposed by the Senate to provide funding for several priority programs, including Medicare and education. The Senate approved a 2.9 percent cut; House conferees are insisting the cut be reduced to no more than 1 percent.

Meanwhile, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Feb. 4 threatened a possible veto unless the final package is held at or below the $755 billion limit set by the President. OMB Director Mitch Daniels sent a letter to top House and Senate appropriators stating that "excessive use of advance appropriations or other mechanisms that would otherwise circumvent the spending limits" would result in OMB recommending the President veto the package. OMB also objected to a number of specific provisions in the bill relating to areas such as homeland security, trade sanctions, and abortion.

Information:
Dave Moore, Senior Associate Vice President
AAMC Government Relations
dbmoore@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement