AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > December 20, 2002

MedPAC Discusses Further IME Reductions

December 20, 2002 - Not deterred by the 15 percent reduction in Medicare indirect medical education (IME) payments that occurred on Oct. 1 (from 6.5 percent to 5.5 percent), at its Dec. 12-13 meeting, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) discussed whether IME payments should be reduced further. Commission staff reported that their most recent analysis indicates that the empirical level of the IME adjustment is 2.7 percent, compared to the 5.5 percent that is being paid to teaching hospitals as set forth in current law for FY 2003. Staff draft recommendations would lower the IME level to 2.7 percent, either immediately in 2004 or phased in over several years. The AAMC is advocating that Congress change the law so that the IME level is maintained at 6.5 percent in 2003 - the level that has been in place since 1999.

The foundation of the IME adjustment is a complex statistical analysis that derives an "empirical" IME level. Since the beginning of the Medicare program Congress has set the IME adjustment above the empirical level. These payments are intended to account for the higher Medicare inpatient costs that occur in teaching hospitals. Any recommendation on the IME level, as well as all other recommendations, will be voted on at the commission's Jan. 15-16 meeting and included in its March Report to Congress.

As part of the discussion, MedPAC staff noted that providing IME payments above the empirical level contributes to major teaching hospitals having Medicare inpatient margins that are higher than other hospital groups. Preliminary data for 2000 indicate Medicare inpatient margins of 22.9 percent for major teaching hospitals compared to margins of 10.2 percent and 4.9 percent for other teaching and nonteaching hospitals, respectively. At the same time, staff noted these payments are important to maintaining total margins for teaching hospitals. The 2000 preliminary data indicate total margins of 1.5 percent for major teaching hospitals, compared to about 4 percent for all other hospitals.

The commissioner's discussion focused, in part, on the role of Medicare in supporting teaching hospitals. One view was that Medicare should pay the empirical level and that additional monies to support teaching hospitals should come from general appropriations. Another view was that Medicare is more than just an insurer and has a social responsibility to help fund additional costs of teaching hospitals, as it has since the beginning of the Medicare program.

In addition to IME, MedPAC also discussed potential update recommendations for the hospital inpatient and outpatient prospective payment systems (PPS). Staff presented a draft recommendation to update inpatient payments by the increase in the hospital market basket (MB) (currently forecasted at 3.3 percent for 2004) plus 0.5 percentage points for cost increases due to technology less 0.9 percentage points for productivity improvements. The result would be an update equal to the MB increase minus 0.4 percentage points. The draft outpatient PPS update would be the MB increase less the 0.9 percentage point productivity factor. No adjustment would be made for new technologies under the outpatient PPS because these items are accounted for separately under the payment system.

Information:
Karen Fisher, Senior Associate Vice President
AAMC Health Care Affairs
kfisher@aamc.org
(202) 862-6140

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement