AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > October 18, 2002

MedPAC Discusses Access to Care, Quality Incentives, Medicare Spending

October 18, 2002-The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) met Oct. 10 and 11 to review several topics of importance in preparation of the commission's March 2003 report to Congress. During the meeting, commissioners reviewed issues including incentives to improve the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries; access to care for Medicare beneficiaries; comparisons of Medicare spending to other spending indicators; county level variation in Medicare per capita spending; payment policies for new technologies; and characteristics of hospitals by Medicare financial performance.

The commissioners received an updated report that discussed access to care for Medicare beneficiaries. National survey data indicates that although beneficiaries overall are satisfied with their current access, trends indicate that there is variation based on socio-demographic dimensions. MedPAC is in the process of developing an ongoing system to monitor beneficiary access to care that will assist commissioners in: evaluating health system capacity; evaluating direct access measures; evaluating Medicare's role; and analyzing policy options. The report used data collected under this new system through the first quarter of 2002. Generally, the data show that access problems occur most frequently for women over age 65, minorities, and individuals living in rural areas. The commission requested further study of these issues in order to incorporate a more informed comment in their March 2003 recommendation.

In another physician related area, MedPAC heard a panel presentation on using incentives, both financial and non-financial to improve the quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. The panelists included Don Berwick, M.D., M.P.P., of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Brent James, M.D., M.Stat., of the Institute for Health Care Delivery Research, Intermountain Health Care and Suzanne DelBanco, Ph.D. of The Leapfrog Group. The panelists discussed the lack of association between expenditures on acute care and outcomes. Dr. Berwick presented the results of a study examining several innovative preventative care programs ranging from diabetes management to smoking cessation that showed financial returns to the insurers in capitated care systems. One problem that was noted in the fee-for-service approach that is used by Medicare is the exclusion of preventative care because it is not part of the "core" of treatment.Using data from major teaching hospitals on cardio infarction outcomes, as an example, Dr. James showed that attention to quality has cost reducing effects. The panelists offered suggestions for MedPAC to study implementing a system that rewards prevention. The goal is to include a chapter on possible incentives in the June 2003 report.

The Commission also received a preliminary study on the characteristics of hospitals by financial performance. Generally, the report concluded that Medicare inpatient margins vary significantly using the hospital as the unit of analysis. Further, the report showed that hospitals receiving disproportionate share (DSH) or indirect medical education (IME) payments have higher Medicare margins than other hospitals. For example, in 1999, the average major teaching hospital receiving DSH had a Medicare margin of 25.7 percent compared to 23.3 percent for an average teaching hospital not receiving DSH. The commissioners asked for a new study using hospital beds rather than the hospital as a unit of analysis to see if this finding and others would still be present.

Finally, the commission considered several issues of spending and payments. These included a discussion of a comparison between Medicare spending and national trends in health care spending and variations at the county level in per capita Medicare spending. It was reported that Medicare spending grew at a slower rate than the national average over the past five years (1997-2001). Overall, Medicare spending as a percentage of personal health care expenditures peaked in 1997 at 22 percent and is expected to settle in at a low of 18 percent by 2003 where it is expected to remain until 2011 when the "baby boomers" begin to enter the Medicare system. The Commissioners also heard a preliminary report on county level spending that is intended to be a chapter in the March 2003 report. Overall, the preliminary results indicate that the largest contributor to county level variations in per capita spending is input prices.

Commissioners also discussed new developments in Medicare+Choice, coverage and payment for new technologies, current issues in skilled nursing facility payment policy, and introduction of the post-acute care episode database.

Information:
Denise Dodero, Associate Vice President
AAMC Health Care Affairs
ddodero@aamc.org
(202) 828-0493
Karen Fisher, Senior Associate Vice President
AAMC Health Care Affairs
kfisher@aamc.org
(202) 862-6140

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement