AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > August 2, 2002

Transfer Proposal Rescinded But Increased Outlier Threshold Remains Under Medicare Final Inpatient Rule

August 2, 2002 - The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Aug. 1 published its federal fiscal year 2003 Medicare inpatient prospective payment system final rule [67 Fed. Reg. 49982]. In a decision that has important financial implications for teaching hospitals, CMS rescinded a policy suggested in the proposed rule to expand its post-acute care transfer policy from the current 10 diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) to all DRGs. Under the policy, hospitals discharging patients associated with one of the 10 DRGS to a post-acute facility prior to the corresponding average length of stay would receive less than the full DRG payment. If CMS' proposal to expand this policy had been implemented, it would have meant almost $2 billion less in Medicare payments to hospitals.

Despite strong comments from the hospital community, CMS did not back off its decision to increase the outlier threshold by 60 percent. The outlier policy is intended to provide additional payments for cases that result in significantly higher costs. To receive the payments, the case's costs must exceed a "threshold." Medicare then pays 80 percent of the costs in excess of the threshold. Under the final rule, the federal FY 2003 outlier threshold will be $33,560, up from $21,025 in federal FY 2002. The agency's primary rationale for such a large increase is that outlier payments are exceeding the amount set aside for this purpose and increasing the threshold will reduce outlier payments to the appropriate level.

In the medical education arena, the final rule implemented without any major changes the proposal to prohibit hospitals that are part of resident limit affiliation agreements from permanently transferring portions of their resident limits at the end of the agreement. Affiliation agreements permit hospitals to aggregate their resident limits and redistribute them among the agreement participants so long as the aggregate limit is not exceeded. Prior to the final rule, participant hospitals were permitted to agree to make these redistributions permanent.

The final rule also implements an update to the standardized payment amount of 2.95 percent. This reflects a market basket increase of 3.5 percent, less 0.55 percentage points (as specified in current law). In legislation passed recently by the House of Representatives (HR 4954), the federal FY 2003 update would equal the full market basket increase; the Senate has yet to act on similar legislative proposals.

CMS proposed a number of changes to the provider-based criteria that must be met for an entity to bill under the Medicare outpatient prospective payment system. The final rule adopts most of the changes as proposed, with the result that provider-based entities located on the campus of the main provider only need to met the criteria related to licensure, integration of clinical services, financial integration and public awareness. Off-campus facilities must meet additional criteria.

Of the many changes to the Emergency Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA or the "anti-dumping law") that were proposed, the only one adopted in this rule is the clarification that EMTALA applies only to those departments on the hospital's main campus that are provider-based; it does not apply to provider-based entities that are either on or off the hospital campus. CMS will publish shortly a separate document that will finalize other changes to the EMTALA policy that had been included in the proposed rule.

Finally, CMS decided not increase the labor-related share of DRG payments that is adjusted by the hospital wage index, as had been proposed.

Information:

Karen Fisher, Sr. Director, Health Care Affairs
AAMC Health Care Affairs
kfisher@aamc.org
(202) 862-6140

Ivy Baer, Director & Regulatory Counsel
AAMC Health Care Affairs
ibaer@aamc.orc
(202) 828-0490

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement