AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Washington Highlights > January 25, 2002

National Academies' Report Supports Therapeutic Cloning

January 25, 2002 - The United States should ban human reproductive cloning aimed at creating a child, according to a National Academies' report released Jan. 18 that considers only the scientific and medical aspects of this issue, plus ethical issues that pertain to human-subjects research. Based on experience with reproductive cloning in animals, the report, entitled Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning, concludes that human reproductive cloning would be dangerous for the woman, fetus, and newborn, and is likely to fail. The study panel did not address the issue of whether human reproductive cloning, even if it were found to be medically safe, would be - or would not be - acceptable to individuals or society.

"Data on the reproductive cloning of animals demonstrate that only a small percentage of attempts are successful, many of the clones die during all stages of gestation, newborn clones often are abnormal or die, and the procedures may carry serious risks for the mother," said Irving L. Weissman, chair of the panel that wrote the report and professor of pathology, cancer biology, and developmental biology at Stanford University. "The proposed ban on human cloning should be reviewed within five years, but it should be reconsidered only if a new scientific review indicates that the procedures are likely to be safe and effective, and if a broad national dialogue on societal, religious, and ethical issues suggests that reconsideration is warranted."
At the same time, the panel concluded that the scientific and medical considerations that justify a ban on human reproductive cloning at this time are not applicable to nuclear transplantation to produce stem cells. Unlike reproductive cloning, the creation of embryonic stem cells by nuclear transplantation - which also has been called nonreproductive cloning, therapeutic cloning, research cloning, or somatic cell nuclear transfer - does not involve implantation of a blastocyst in a uterus.

Because of the considerable potential for developing new medical therapies to treat life-threatening diseases and advancing biomedical knowledge, the panel supported the conclusion of a September 2001 National Academies' report - Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine - that biomedical research using nuclear transplantation to produce stem cells be permitted.

The panel stressed that all concerned segments of society should examine and debate the broad societal, religious, and ethical issues associated with human reproductive cloning, as well as those associated with nuclear transplantation to produce stem cells. Although this report focuses on the scientific and medical aspects of these areas, it should help to inform this broader consideration by society.

Information:

Dave Moore, Senior Director
AAMC Government Relations
dbmoore@aamc.org
(202) 828-0525

e-mail icon Get Washington Highlights in your Inbox!

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement