Quality Forum's
Hospital Measures Steering Committee Discusses Candidate Measures and
Framework
The Hospital Quality Measures Steering Committee of the National Forum
for Health Care Quality Measurement and Reporting met on Oct. 24 to
discuss the Forum's two-part hospital quality measures project. The
project stems from the Quality Interagency Task Force's (QuIC) February
2000 report to the President on patient safety initiatives in the federal
government. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and
the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are jointly sponsoring
the project.
The first part of the project will consist of a review of current measures
used by the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Health Care Organizations
(JCAHO), peer review organizations and others. The steering committee
will use the review of measures to develop an initial set of quality
performance measures for the nation's acute care hospitals. The Forum
hopes to complete this aspect of the project by December 2001. The second
part of the project involves developing a framework to review new measures
and update the initial set. The Forum's goal is to complete this work
by October 2002.
Forum staff briefed the steering committee on findings from the Minority
Healthcare Quality Measurement and Reporting Workshop the Forum held
in June. Findings raised during this discussion included, among others,
the need to have a standardized format for collecting race and ethnicity
data and collecting it routinely and consistently with hospital performance
measures.
The steering committee reviewed an augment list of candidate measures,
which reflected their comments from the May meeting [see Washington
Highlights, May 25]. The
list consisted of 29 measures in 7 priority areas including: Acute Myocardial
Infarction, Cebrovasular disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Coronary
Artherosclerosis, Gastrointestinal disease, Pneumonia, and Pregnancy/childbirth/maternal/
neonatal care. The steering committee and Forum staff discussed several
aspects of the candidate measures including the reporting burden, the
length of the list, and additional measures for each priority area.
They agreed to eliminate gastrointestinal disease because there was
only one measure and an inadequate risk adjustment mechanism to account
for variations. There was also significant discussion about these conditions
and others as they relate to other specialties such as pediatrics.
At the May meeting the steering committee broke into three working
groups: Priorities and Scope, Implementation and Measurement System,
and Reporting. Representatives from each of these groups presented their
recommendations to the steering committee on the set of hospital measures.
Several issues were raised during these presentations including the
measures' applicability to small hospitals, criteria for evaluating
the measures, terminology, and methods for measuring patient perception
of care.
Information: Jeff Patyk, AAMC
Division of Health Care Affairs, 202-828-0498.