House Letter
Recommends Changes to Outpatient Pass-Through Payment for Drugs, Devices
and Technologies
Expressing concern that Medicare hospital "pass-through" payments for
outpatient drugs, devices, and technology are inadequate and inappropriate,
Reps. Bill Thomas (R-Calif.), Nancy Johnson (R-Conn.) and Pete Stark
(D-Calif.) July 27 wrote a letter
to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Tom
Scully recommending administrative and legislative changes be made.
In a Ways and Means Committee press
release, Rep. Johnson stated, "There are problems in the way these
payments are calculated that pose barriers to providing them in outpatient
settings." Said Rep. Thomas, "CMS needs more time to develop adequate
and appropriate Medicare payments for these services, reducing the need
to lower payments."
The payment problems stem from the "unintended consequences" of the
Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999. Under current law, Medicare
"pass-through" payments for outpatient drugs, devices and technologies
cannot exceed 2 percent of total Medicare hospital outpatient payments.
If the total amount of pass-through payments exceeds the 2 percent cap,
payments must be reduced on a pro-rated basis. CMS has unofficially
indicated that the pro-rated reduction proposed for 2002 will be between
60 and 80 percent, which would significantly reduce reimbursements made
to teaching hospitals for their use of outpatient drugs, devices and
technologies.
"We recommend that CMS accelerate the process of including these costs
within the base payment rates, which would create more accurate payment
rates and reduce the need for a pro-rata reduction," said the letter.
Costs for the pass-through items would therefore be moved more quickly
into the base payment rates for outpatient services. In addition, the
authors recommended two additional administrative actions: reassess
eligibility criteria for purposes of pass-through payments; and move
the update of the payment rates from Jan. 1 to April 1 due to unavailability
of data. (The AAMC, along with other hospital organizations, supports
delaying next year's implementation by six months instead of three.)
The authors recommend hospital and beneficiaries be held harmless from
a delay in implementation.
Reps. Thomas, Johnson, and Stark also indicated their interest in making
three legislative changes to "ensure that the rates are updated and
the underlying methodology is improved." They include: