AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Teaching Physicians > PATH and Other Fraud & Abuse Issues

The Physician Self-Referral ("Stark") Regulation

Related Resources

Stark Regulation

The Stark law was passed in 1993 and became effective January 1, 1995, although final regulations were not published until many years later. The law prohibits a physician (or an immediate family member) who has a financial relationship with an entity from making a referral to that entity for furnishing a designated health service (DHS) for which Medicare or Medicaid would otherwise pay. The DHS's covered by the law are: (1) clinical laboratory; (2) physical therapy (including speech-language pathology services); (3) occupational therapy; (4) radiology, including magnetic resonance imaging, computerized axial tomography scans and ultrasound; (5) radiation therapy services and supplies; (6) durable medical equipment and supplies; (7) parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies; (8) prosthetics, orthotics, and prosthetic devices and supplies; (9) home health services; (10) outpatient prescription drugs; and (11) inpatient and outpatient hospital services. Congress provided for a number of exceptions to this prohibition and gave CMS the authority to create additional exceptions.

On March 19, 2004, CMS issued a One-Time Notification implementing the 18 month moratorium on physician investment in specialty hospitals as required by the Medicare Modernization Act. On April 6, 2004, corrections to the March 26 regulation were published in the Federal Register.

The regulation is very lengthy and complex and should be reviewed by each organization's legal counsel in light of specific business arrangements and referral patterns related to a particular hospital, faculty practice plan, individual physician, or other health care entity.

One of the important changes CMS made from the proposed rule to the final rule was the addition of an academic medical center exception. On March 26, 2004, CMS published an interim final rule that made a number of significant changes in the AMC exception.

The academic medical center exception has several basic requirements. The referring physician must: (1) be a bona fide employee of the academic medical center on a full-time or substantial part-time basis; (2) be licensed to practice medicine in the state(s) in which he or she practices; (3) have a bona fide faculty appointment; and (4) provide either substantial academic services or substantial clinical teaching services for which the faculty member receives compensation as part of his or her employment relationship with the academic medical center. The exception also has requirements relating to the physician's compensation: it must be set in advance, not exceed fair market value, and not be determined in a manner that takes into account the volume or value of any referrals or other business generated by the referring physician within the academic medical center.

In addition, the academic medical center must meet all of the following requirements: (1) all transfers of money must directly or indirectly support the missions of teaching, indigent care, research or community service; (2) the relationship of the components of the academic medical center must be set out in written agreements or other written documents that have been adopted by the governing body of each component; (3) all money paid to a referring physician for research must be used solely to support bona fide research or teaching and must be consistent with the terms and conditions of the grant.

Notable Revisions and Clarifications

  • Meaning of "set in advance"

As is true of several other exceptions, the academic medical center exception requires that a physician's compensation be "set in advance." CMS has modified the interpretation of "set in advance" to permit some percentage compensation. The "set in advance" criteria are met if (1) the formula for calculating percentage compensation is established with specificity prospectively; (2) is objectively verifiable; and (3) may not be changed over the course of the agreement between the parties based on the volume or value of referrals or other business generated by the referring physician. Compensation also is "set in advance" if it is set in an agreement before the services for which payment is being made are rendered. The compensation also must be set at "fair market value"(discussed below). These clarifications are important and should allow for flexible compensation arrangements that meet the Stark requirements.

  • Definition of "academic medical center"

CMS has broadened the definition of an academic medical center so that hospitals or health systems that sponsor 4 or more approved medical education programs (termed "an accredited academic hospital") will qualify for the exception if they meet the other criteria of the exception. The hospital or health system that meets this criteria may be the same hospital that is an "affiliated hospital." The "affiliated hospital" is one in which a majority of the physician on the medical staff are faculty members and a majority of all hospital admissions are made by physicians who are faculty members. In addition, the referring physician may be on the faculty of the affiliated medical school or the accredited academic hospital. ·

  • Requirements related to structure of faculty practice plan

CMS has eliminated the criteria that a faculty practice plan be a tax exempt 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(4) organization. Instead, there must be sufficient assurance that the faculty practice plan is part of a bona fide academic medical center and that the practice plan supports the core teaching mission. An academic medical center may have more than one affiliated faculty practice plans and the plan(s) can be affiliated with the teaching hospital, medical school, or "accredited academic hospital."

  • Requirements related to hospital's medical staff and admissions by faculty

The exception requires that a majority of the affiliated hospital's medical staff be faculty members and that a majority of the hospital's admissions be made by faculty members. The Agency has clarified several points. First, a teaching hospital can include any faculty, including courtesy and volunteer faculty, in determining whether it qualifies under these tests. Second, residents and non-physician professionals do not need to be included as medical staff. CMS also states that: (i) the majority of physicians on the medical staff must be on the faculty, and (ii) the aggregation of faculty from any affiliated medical school is permitted.

  • Bona fide employees of a component of the academic medical center

The exception itself is only available for referrals by physicians who are bona fide employees of a component of the academic medical center. This is to ensure that the relationship between the physician and the party paying the remuneration is sufficiently different from the usual arrangements of entities and organizations that are not academic medical centers. For the same reason, primary care physicians who do not perform substantial academic services (defined below) or clinical teaching services cannot qualify for this exception, though other exceptions may be available to them. CMS states that "a referring physician could be an employee of the teaching hospital and a volunteer faculty member, as long as his or her employment encompasses substantial academic services of clinical teaching services."

  • Substantial academic services or clinical teaching

The requirement that the referring physician provide substantial academic or clinical teaching services means that the physician spends at least 20 percent of his or her professional time, or alternatively, 8 hours per week, providing academic services or clinical teaching (or a combination of both). CMS notes that this is not an absolute requirement, but a "safe harbor," so that physicians who do not meet this standard may still be providing substantial academic or clinical teaching services, depending on circumstances. The Agency advises that academic medical centers should use a "reasonable and consistent method" to calculate a physician's academic and clinical teaching services. CMS also clarifies that the substantial services test can be met through either academic services (which include, without limitation, both classroom and academic research services) or clinical teaching services, or a combination of both.

  • Determining a teaching physician's fair market value

When determining whether a teaching physician's compensation is at fair market value, the comparison can be to either other academic medical centers or comparable private practice physicians in the academic medical center's area if that is the higher amount.

  • Written agreement or appropriately documented course of conduct

The previous regulation required that the agreement among the components of the academic medical center be set out in a written agreement. CMS acknowledges that it was not their intent to require a single written document. The relationships must be memorialized in writing or there must be a clearly established course of conduct that is appropriately documented. If the academic medical center is a single entity, financial reports that document transfers of funds between components would suffice.

  • Money paid to referring physician for research must be for bona fide research or teaching

Payments to physicians through grants that may be used for teaching are acceptable. However, payments to referring to physicians for indigent care or community service will not fit within this exception, though they may be able to fit within another exception.

It is important to remember that if the AMC criteria can not be met, the regulations contain other exceptions that may be helpful.

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement