AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Government Affairs & Advocacy Site Map

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Teaching Physicians > Fee Schedule & Other Payment Issues > Historical Regulations

Implementation of a Resource-based Practice Expense Methodology to Calculate Practice Expense Relative Values for the Medicare Fee Schedule

Related Resources

AAMC Documents

AAMC Models Impact of Practice Expense Changes

AAMC staff have completed an impact analysis on total Medicare payments by specialty of the proposed resource-based practice expense relative value units (PE-RVUs) published by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) (Federal Register June 5, 30818-31012). The analysis was completed using 1996 Medicare service volume data from a sample of 27 member practice plans. This current analysis is an update to a similar analysis performed last year when the 1997 proposed rule was issued by HCFA.

The 1998 rule is proposing an improved methodology that results in less dramatic payment reductions to surgical and procedure-oriented medical specialties and relatively small payment increases to primary care specialties. The impact by specialty is arrayed in Table 1 below. While the differences in impact between academic physicians as a subset of all physicians is difficult to explain, the impact on any given specialty, states HCFA, will depend upon the patient mix and utilization of services. The AAMC believes that patient mix will account for reductions in certain specialties that are projected to receive increases in payment nationally. For example, academic physicians in anesthesia, internal medicine, otolaryngology, general and plastic surgery, Ob/Gyn, among others will see payments decline, while community physicians in the same specialties are likely to see small increases in total payments.

For more information, contact Denise Dodero (ddodero@aamc.org), Assistant Vice President, Division of Health Care Affairs at 202-828-0493.

Table 1

Impact of Proposed Practice Expense Methodology on Total Medicare Allowed Charges for Academic Physicians Compared to All Physicians By Specialty (Cumulative Change at End of Four Year Transition)

Specialty1

Mean % Change

Academic Physicians

All Physicians

1998 Method1

1997 Method2

1998 Method1

Anesthesia -7 N/A 2
Cardiology -15 -34 -13
Cardiothoracic Surgery -14 -27 -14
Dermatology 6 17 27
Emergency Medicine -14 -0.1 -13
Endocrinology 6 6 N/A
Family Practice 5 8 6
Gastroenterology -16 -20 -14
General Practice 7 14 3
General Surgery -12 -14 -6
Hematology/Oncology -1 3 2
Internal Medicine -8 -10 1
Neurology 4 6 0
Neurosurgery -11 -19 -10
Ob/Gyn -2 -4 5
Occupational Medicine 3 1 N/A
Ophthalmology 7 -8 11
Orthopaedics -3 -11 -1
Otolaryngology -4 -9 6
Pathology 14 N/A -10
Pediatrics -1 -4 N/A
Plastic Surgery -2 -6 5
Psychiatry -1 2 4
Pulmonary -5 -2 -3
Radiation Oncology -15 -20 -13
Radiology -20 -8 -13
Rheumatology 10 7 15
Urology -1 -2 7
Source: AAMC analysis based on volume data from 27 practice plans. Data for all physicians is from Health Care Financing Administration analysis.

1 HCFA Methodology proposed June 5, 1998

2 HCFA Methodology proposed June 18, 1997

Contact Us    © 1995-2008 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement