Implementation of a Resource-based
Practice Expense Methodology to Calculate Practice Expense Relative
Values for the Medicare Fee Schedule
 |
 |
 |
Related Resources
AAMC Documents
|
 |
AAMC Models Impact of Practice Expense Changes
AAMC staff have completed an impact analysis on total Medicare
payments by specialty of the proposed resource-based practice
expense relative value units (PE-RVUs) published by the Health
Care Financing Administration (HCFA) (Federal
Register June 5, 30818-31012). The analysis was completed
using 1996 Medicare service volume data from a sample of 27
member practice plans. This current analysis is an update
to a similar analysis performed last year when the 1997 proposed
rule was issued by HCFA.
The 1998 rule is proposing an improved methodology that results
in less dramatic payment reductions to surgical and procedure-oriented
medical specialties and relatively small payment increases
to primary care specialties. The impact by specialty is arrayed
in Table 1 below. While the differences in impact between
academic physicians as a subset of all physicians is difficult
to explain, the impact on any given specialty, states HCFA,
will depend upon the patient mix and utilization of services.
The AAMC believes that patient mix will account for reductions
in certain specialties that are projected to receive increases
in payment nationally. For example, academic physicians in
anesthesia, internal medicine, otolaryngology, general and
plastic surgery, Ob/Gyn, among others will see payments decline,
while community physicians in the same specialties are likely
to see small increases in total payments.
For more information, contact Denise Dodero (ddodero@aamc.org),
Assistant Vice President, Division of Health Care Affairs
at 202-828-0493.
Table 1
|
Impact of Proposed Practice Expense Methodology
on Total Medicare Allowed Charges for Academic Physicians
Compared to All Physicians By Specialty (Cumulative
Change at End of Four Year Transition)
|
|
Specialty1
|
Mean % Change
|
|
Academic Physicians
|
All Physicians
|
|
1998 Method1
|
1997 Method2
|
1998 Method1
|
| Anesthesia |
-7 |
N/A |
2 |
| Cardiology |
-15 |
-34 |
-13 |
| Cardiothoracic Surgery |
-14 |
-27 |
-14 |
| Dermatology |
6 |
17 |
27 |
| Emergency Medicine |
-14 |
-0.1 |
-13 |
| Endocrinology |
6 |
6 |
N/A |
| Family Practice |
5 |
8 |
6 |
| Gastroenterology |
-16 |
-20 |
-14 |
| General Practice |
7 |
14 |
3 |
| General Surgery |
-12 |
-14 |
-6 |
| Hematology/Oncology |
-1 |
3 |
2 |
| Internal Medicine |
-8 |
-10 |
1 |
| Neurology |
4 |
6 |
0 |
| Neurosurgery |
-11 |
-19 |
-10 |
| Ob/Gyn |
-2 |
-4 |
5 |
| Occupational Medicine |
3 |
1 |
N/A |
| Ophthalmology |
7 |
-8 |
11 |
| Orthopaedics |
-3 |
-11 |
-1 |
| Otolaryngology |
-4 |
-9 |
6 |
| Pathology |
14 |
N/A |
-10 |
| Pediatrics |
-1 |
-4 |
N/A |
| Plastic Surgery |
-2 |
-6 |
5 |
| Psychiatry |
-1 |
2 |
4 |
| Pulmonary |
-5 |
-2 |
-3 |
| Radiation Oncology |
-15 |
-20 |
-13 |
| Radiology |
-20 |
-8 |
-13 |
| Rheumatology |
10 |
7 |
15 |
| Urology |
-1 |
-2 |
7 |
| Source: AAMC analysis based on volume data
from 27 practice plans. Data for all physicians is from
Health Care Financing Administration analysis. |
1 HCFA Methodology proposed June
5, 1998
2 HCFA Methodology proposed June
18, 1997
|