AAMC Home   Tomorrow's Doctors Tomorrow's Cures
  Home  Government Affairs   Newsroom   Meetings   Publications Shopping Cart   Site Map    

Home

Washington Highlights

Legislative Action Center

Testimony & Correspondence

Top Issues:

 

Education

 

GME & IME Payments

Health Reform

HIPAA

Labor-HHS Appropriations

Research

Teaching Hospitals

Teaching Physicians

Veterans Affairs

Workforce

Contact

 

Government Affairs Home > Teaching Hospitals > Medicare Inpatient PPS

Fiscal Year 2007 Medicare Inpatient Prospective Payment System Proposed Rule

Related Resources

Current Status

On June 12, the AAMC submitted comments on the FY 2007 Medicare inpatient prospective payment system proposed rule.

Brief Overview
Major teaching hospitals would see their Medicare per case payments increase by significantly less than what Congress authorized if changes in the rule are finalized. According to the CMS press release, this proposed rule begins a transition to the "first significant revision of the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) since its implementation in 1983."

CMS has indicated it will consider comments it receives in response to its proposal. In a press release, CMS Administrator Mark McClellan states that "This proposed rule will be shaped by the public comment process. . .We look forward to comprehensive feedback from hospitals, suppliers, and other stakeholders that will help to refine and improve the final version of the rule."

The proposed rule was published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the Federal Register [71 Fed. Reg. 23996] on April 25.

Impact
While current law specifies that the Medicare base per case payment increase by 3.4 percent in FY 2007, CMS estimates that teaching hospitals training 100 or more residents would see average per case payments in FY 2007 that would be only 2.1 percent higher than last year. Other teaching hospitals and non-teaching hospitals would see increases of 2.6 percent and 4.8 percent respectively; rural hospitals would see an average increase of 6.7 percent.

DRG Changes
A portion of the lower increase is due to the legislatively mandated cut in indirect medical education (IME) payments, from 5.55 percent to 5.35 percent. However, the reduction also is due in large part to a proposed significant regulatory change to the diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment weight calculation from a charge-based method to a hospital-specific cost based method. According to the proposed rule, this change reduces payments from those cases that require more ancillary services, such as surgical cases, while medical cases would see payment increases.

The movement from a charge-based to cost-based weighting methodology is the first of CMS's envisioned two-part transformation to the IPPS. In FY 2008, CMS proposes to move to a new DRG system that would better reflect severity. In theory, such a change should help major teaching hospitals because they tend to treat the most severe Medicare patients.

DGME and IME Changes
The rule also contained several changes to Medicare direct graduate medical education (DGME) and IME payments.

A purported clarification by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that would prohibit teaching hospitals from including, for purposes of Medicare direct graduate medical education (DGME) and indirect medical education (IME) payments, time that residents spend in didactic activities could have an impact on both teaching hospital Medicare payments as well GME educational activities.

The proposed rule states that resident training that occurs in non-hospital sites must be related to patient care if a hospital wishes to count that time for DGME and IME payment purposes. Resident time spent in didactic activities that often may occur in associated medical schools, such as educational conferences, journal clubs, and seminars would be specifically excluded. CMS noted that its statement in a previous letter on this topic "implying that didactic time spent in non-hospital settings could be counted for direct GME and IME . . .was inaccurate." CMS noted that time spent in these activities could be counted for DGME purposes if they occur in a hospital; however, the counting prohibition applies for IME payments regardless of where the educational activity occurs.

The proposed rule also contains several more minor technical changes relating to documentation requirements, GME aggregation agreements, and determination of per resident amounts when teaching hospitals merge.

Contacts
Karen Fisher, Sr. Director, Health Care Affairs
AAMC Health Care Affairs
kfisher@aamc.org
(202) 862-6140

Diana Mayes, Specialist
AAMC Health Care Affairs
dmayes@aamc.org
(202) 828-0498

Contact Us    © 1995-2010 AAMC    Terms and Conditions    Privacy Statement    Supported Browsers
Become a fan on Facebook  Follow Us on Twitter